Return-Path: Received: from [207.46.163.187] (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5329240 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:30:32 +0100 Received: from CO1PR06MB265.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.71.15) by CO1PR06MB267.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.71.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.842.7; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:33:38 +0000 Received: from CO1PR06MB265.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.200]) by CO1PR06MB265.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.200]) with mapi id 15.00.0842.003; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:33:37 +0000 From: Stephen van Vuuren To: After Effects Mail List Subject: RE: [AE] (OT) New Mac Pro - Who's getting it? Thread-Topic: [AE] (OT) New Mac Pro - Who's getting it? Thread-Index: AQHPAkkn1JVDJ53Mb0Op7ybwYl3BVZpmkooA Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:33:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [24.163.5.74] x-forefront-prvs: 007271867D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019001)(189002)(199002)(24454002)(11905935001)(377454003)(51704005)(13464003)(76796001)(76786001)(85306002)(74662001)(56776001)(76576001)(46102001)(69226001)(76482001)(83072002)(47446002)(19580395003)(54356001)(19580405001)(81686001)(33646001)(74706001)(31966008)(83322001)(74366001)(85852003)(53806001)(65816001)(80022001)(66066001)(77096001)(81816001)(2656002)(90146001)(15395725003)(4396001)(15202345003)(50986001)(47976001)(63696002)(49866001)(81342001)(47736001)(87936001)(51856001)(80976001)(74502001)(56816005)(54316002)(15975445006)(74876001)(79102001)(74316001)(59766001)(81542001)(87266001)(77982001)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR06MB267;H:CO1PR06MB265.namprd06.prod.outlook.com;CLIP:24.163.5.74;FPR:;RD:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sv2studios.com > Here's an interesting article on the value proposition of the new Mac Pro= . Turns out it's tough to build a comparable machine for the price. - Unfortunately, that's a lazy and poorly researched article. The new Mac Pro= is an intriguing mystery of parts. I'm currently researching parts for a new build to help finish my film and = was curious about the Mac Pro parts (FirePro GPUs, PCI SSD etc.). The huge = dollar issue with the MacPro is GPU and getting good information about exac= tly what they has not been easy.=20 But I found this published a couple of days ago: http://wccftech.com/genera= tion-amd-professional-gpu-arrives-firepro-d700-leads-pack-35-teraflops-comp= ute/=20 They claim this is confirmed but I would still not say this is 100%. But it= does further open up the mystery of the GPU parts. They appear to be cut d= own, TDP reduced parts to work in the new case. The focus on dual parts als= o appears part of the heat/power management issue to balance thermal thrott= ling that invariably would be part of such a design. Apple appears to have made some deal possibly including custom manufacturin= g that may allow them to get parts that don't spec out for higher TDP use (= like Intel does with hex vs. quad core parts) and using them here to give t= he Mac Pro a GPU price advantage you can't match on off-the-shelf parts - o= f course OpenCL performance will need to be part of question as CUDA is not= an option. So they are not exactly like any parts you can buy. Additionally, they like= ly will have a unique set of drivers, so until someone can actually careful= ly benchmark their OpenCL performance, it's near impossible to price compar= ison a Mac Pro right now. And it appears for any configuration an "apple to= apple" :) price/build comparison is not possible even with just the GPU. The PCI SSD is also a benchmark test waiting to be done to see if it fact d= oes deliver the performance difference claimed - but given the impossibilit= y of putting in a variety of parts for testing in a the new Mac Pro, this a= lso will likely be somewhat inaccurate. But I'm not sure PCI SSD vs current= SSD options, including a RAID 1 SSD ,offers that much boost. And the limit= ations of the storage design in the new Mac Pro introduce a number of other= issues related to expandability, flexibility etc. Plus the article does not actually build anything nor benchmark either the = DIY system or the Mac Pro - so all the valuations are essentially meaningle= ss. It's just an internet shopping cart article. The one published Geekbenc= h benchmark that was out there is not exactly blazing - and the only thing = that should matter is actual application performance. Until that is tested = - an article like this does not tell you anything other than Apple used a l= ot of custom, proprietary parts that you can't buy off the shelf.=20 Throwing money at the effort to mimic the Mac Pro parts list to "prove" the= MacPro is a "value" seems like a waste of time - if you did this with an i= Phone, you would get a similar result. The real question is what Mac Pro's = real world performance in various configs are and what parts are required t= o match it. My DIY builds are set to give real world performance that matches or exceed= Xenon based setups at half the price. That's perfectly doable on the CPU s= ide. The Mac Pro may have GPU advantage based on essentially cutting down w= orkstation cards that we've always expected were overpriced - but that inf= ormation has not been tested and 100% proved yet. stephen van vuuren 336.202.4777 http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ http://www.sv2dcp.com/ http://www.sv2studios.com/ A film is - or should be - more like music than like fiction. It should be = a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what's behind the emotion, = the meaning, all that comes later. -Stanley Kubrick -----Original Message----- From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of= Dave Bittner Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 9:46 AM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] (OT) New Mac Pro - Who's getting it? Here's an interesting article on the value proposition of the new Mac Pro. = Turns out it's tough to build a comparable machine for the price. -=20 On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:20PM, Dave Bittner wrote: > I've switched our main edit suite system to a 27" i7 iMac after realizing= that it renders about three times faster than the 2008 Mac Pro it's replac= ing. I've got a 30" monitor hooked up to it, and a fast external RAID via a= cheap Thunderbolt to SATA adapter. We're running AE, FCPX and Maya on it, = primarily, and for what we do it's plenty fast. (We are rarely under tight = delivery deadlines where rendering speed would make or break us. In fact, t= he biggest bottleneck these days seems to be h.264 encoding for delivery.) >=20 > As for the new Mac Pro, if you need the speed it doesn't seem the price s= hould make all that much difference. Even if you replace it after two years= , a couple of grand difference in price shouldn't break the bank for an act= ive shop with a decent number of projects coming through. It's amazing to m= e that after all these years people are still shocked - Shocked! - that the= re's a premium for Mac OS workstations. For our small shop it's worth it, s= ince we know the Mac OS and know how to troubleshoot it.=20 >=20 > Interesting times, with all of these incredibly fast machines for choose = from. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go play Marathon on my Quadra 7= 00... >=20 +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to