Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5345021 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:11:58 +0100 Received: from atl4webmail09 ([10.30.71.166]) by atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0D5FhBm025089 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:15:43 -0500 Received: from 220.233.147.134 (chris@chriszwar.com [220.233.147.134]) by atl4webmail09 (Netsol 11.2.30) with WEBMAIL id 22751; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:15:43 +0000 From: "Chris Zwar" To: "After Effects Mail List" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Network Solutions Webmail, Build 11.2.30 X-Originating-IP: [220.233.147.134] X-Forwarded-For: [(null)] X-Authenticated-UID: chris@chriszwar.com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:15:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [AE] a very important question for every After Effects user MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable -----Original Message----- From: Todd Kopriva [mailto:kopriva@adobe.com] The question is how much of our finite resources you want us to spend on = making things faster versus adding new creative features, new formats, et= c. Todd, Just echoing a previous reply - can you please clarify if you're referrin= g to raw rendering speed only, or if you're referring to everything ie. i= nterface / usability / general project handling etc etc? Because the pro= gram itself does get pretty chuggy when projects get big, regardless of r= endering speed. Also, will comments in this thread be forwarded to Steve or should we mak= e sure that we reply in the Adobe forum too? -Chris