Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.212.44] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5345327 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:47:23 +0100 Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x8so4849455vbf.3 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:51:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=HYrH6H01nq4pjRhfoyMTblhex0o6heQKEAqD0U2TyiU=; b=CiPw0fZBfPTZCkup9HUERpQAJbxOR51bvCstPVYC45oJTSApoHJI+Sj0wEvzKjAuNm sbdKQxyQBE3/SmI4lLYBvNCr7lzVvufoE50untkzd1O3IdYJf6ZHwqYFzb1dft4PF1mJ 2kFD189UkGXX/2HIs+FZd3D7A9WBff/1LPhv/Kzm8+dycsYJmU7SHt3BCFyoQ6LGwjMX k2sk9RvxRR4sNkOHYLEBNw7YS30lKyq7ZbrgYrgoXT/aBz3bCAeMwlRkF2WU+OM9foF0 nFaFdsCuQfrcs7IQATePqKVae9N80xf+2WW1uHAk+i8IAOJTo+MlomC5NFcl+5EwVFVA FqRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3Yw87dtUOwcuvJgyxOruRLoKyUjxdQPPDyDIPMYQBjOuTFKByLuDPw3DiZEAMNW/gUi6a X-Received: by 10.52.229.39 with SMTP id sn7mr14587769vdc.2.1389617469334; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:51:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.46.193 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 04:50:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Kjettrup Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] a very important question for every After Effects user To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01182bbea23d7204efd987ea --089e01182bbea23d7204efd987ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > 2014/1/13 Roland Kahlenberg (RoRK) > > > 2) competing products will not sit still and watch the AE Team utilize permanent man/brain > resources on improving application speed while neglecting creative enhancements > I would say that many of the competitors are already faster than AE, but lack many of the creative tools that AE has, so i think it is right to really focus on speed now. Im thinking about the small AE like Hitfilm, SGO Mamba FX that both are realtime in many aspects, and both Nuke and Fusion is also moving more in the GPU direction making much of the work near realtime. > 5) can work on speed improvements be contracted out? > I dont hope Adobe considers to have outsiders work on the source code, it could be a potentiel disaster stability wise. Keep the code internal to the small group that knows it inside out... or well, what do i know about programming, it just doest sound like a good idea in my head. AE has always been incredible stable for me... apart from the odd version: CS4. Robert --089e01182bbea23d7204efd987ea Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>= 2014/1/13 Roland Kahlenberg (RoRK) <aemaillist@broadcastgems.c= om>>=A0
>=A0
> 2) = competing products will not sit still and watch the AE Team utilize permane= nt man/brain=A0
> resources on improving= application speed while neglecting creative enhancements
>

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
I would say = that many of the competitors are already faster than AE, but lack many of t= he creative tools that AE has, so i think it is right to really focus on sp= eed now.
Im thinking about the small AE like Hitfilm, SGO= Mamba FX that both are realtime in many aspects, and both Nuke and Fusion = is also moving more in the GPU direction making much of the work near realt= ime.


<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">> 5) can work on speed improvements be contrac= ted out?
>

I dont hope Adobe considers to have outsiders work on the so= urce code, it could be a potentiel disaster stability wise. Keep the code i= nternal to the small group that knows it inside out... or well, what do i k= now about programming, it just doest sound like a good idea in my head.=A0<= /div>
AE has always been incredible stable for me... apart from the odd vers= ion: CS4.


Robert
<= /div> --089e01182bbea23d7204efd987ea--