Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com ([209.85.223.170] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5347509 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:20:49 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u16so854533iet.15 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:24:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=qN1DL1+7fkXpEE5ZCjS5H4vzzF4RYgFzjkcNQE3EC6o=; b=V5TjyN1GQuMSRL1H7RsEfplwOU930ZFXatHqEl48Wyz4B11Cri2mb0xYg37rH5Tb6m 1BpI694hvcoETC+Y7EMspLRZ0KEiSTorBAanx2nRfBXpL5++w5JgNepwEti1jAZC6wcI zJ4iZbJ360M3JK1MwL3kuRlJmsUUgfj7TWflgLSIg7YDm149/CiNAWq5AS2SPRn4cZ3l +W18jkT4eq6ao7sxHDkvN0ClunWmltTJ3S4iJ6OzG87wn07UJMjdM4I2PlKHQl986gnG vnzI6oQ+eZSnHTFDYGir+Sfbre/2SKounyLJYKIQfzgv0vjyDQMLADBs36lvGDkX7+g4 WktA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYprPYDfqn/oGP0xM36nXz/akOuUGLisx3dvY2pxoTgQFoTbrZAdFDJhnVCdmOm7y9IXS+ X-Received: by 10.50.22.72 with SMTP id b8mr5238700igf.13.1389817479198; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:24:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.223.167 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:24:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Walter Soyka Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:24:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Thoughts on ultra-high resolution To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10c947269f8204f008194b --047d7b10c947269f8204f008194b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: > 5. Get the an SSD dedicate to AE cache =96 you will want 256 to 500 > GB for decent fast cache for 4K previews. Even a 1TB would not be overkil= l > if your master is over 4K. And you might consider PCIe-attached solid state storage for the cache instead of a SATA SSD. It's startingly easy to saturate the SATA bus with any combination of large rasters, higher bit depths, and lots of layers. A single 19,200 x 8640 buffer at only 8bpc is 632 MB -- or two second's worth of bandwidth for SATA 3Gb/s, or one second's worth of bandwidth on SATA 6Gb/s. You could cut that in half again or better with PCIe flash storage like the Fusion ioFX. *Walter Soyka* | Keen Live Email walter@keenlive.com Office 845.790.0813 --047d7b10c947269f8204f008194b Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:
5.=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Get the an SSD dedic= ate to AE cache =96 you will want 256 to 500 GB for decent fast cache for 4= K previews. Even a 1TB would not be overkill if your master is over 4K.

And you might consider PCI= e-attached solid state storage for the cache instead of a SATA SSD. It'= s startingly easy to saturate the SATA bus with any combination of large ra= sters, higher bit depths, and lots of layers.

A single 19= ,200 x 8640 buffer at only 8bpc is 632 MB -- or two second's worth of b= andwidth for SATA 3Gb/s, or one second's worth of bandwidth on SATA 6Gb= /s. You could cut that in half again or better with PCIe flash storage like= the Fusion ioFX.

Walter Soyka =A0| =A0Keen Live
= Email=A0walter@keenlive.com
Office 845.790.0813

--047d7b10c947269f8204f008194b--