Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5347520 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:41:16 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id e14so2648405iej.17 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:45:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=uiy8RMWk1JIDcmNOIKNMIcjJqhr+PZcUYGqjH8lcBlA=; b=Mi9nZtpVoCjb15Vh6ERucBmjK5YpW+ZqYO6JwYES/w3t4Wfzyh18j0ROILona1fYrd b/pkJkQp3S+0p8096jLE8u8bmHCX0AwTzr6MxH30vt0lIsPDWFt9BLqYIs4kwZMkHOBM HegvoSI3IkGOg8PtM6WqhdUSCbELCZEgt/n3JmvlNeMoa4diKmLDYkTjW3gTm9pr+5u2 HVxKcBsF/o6Q+K8odpy255F+VOkdUmoQv/3IN5O5KMtppg+NUic+4XtIAkHgzsonjCXd otiH/+Et/G44eL2uv+z4gOMCynGrNf6SCg5GKxh1Sp39+nf57Z35n2owr0IMFYJfzci+ x0bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmls1hRtrh2zun8izr4QHr54NPcRxRsqxKDyuRoQQfKwZH/L2HaQDeCidKa05r3nsZgXcw9 X-Received: by 10.50.79.228 with SMTP id m4mr5197579igx.47.1389818706451; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:45:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.223.167 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Walter Soyka Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:44:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Thoughts on ultra-high resolution To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a1f164d170604f0086237 --089e013a1f164d170604f0086237 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: > A RAID 0 SSD will be nearly as fast and in my experience you are rarely > running a RAM preview in AE and doing something else I/O heavy at the sam= e > time, so that saturation won=92t happen in AE that often. I have an OWC Accelsior here which I think is basically this. I find that caching in the background is disk-bound with multi-layer, large-format comps. Playing back the composite preview is nowhere near as demanding as actually writing the individual caches for each layer-frame in the comp in the first place. *Walter Soyka* | Keen Live Email walter@keenlive.com Office 845.790.0813 --089e013a1f164d170604f0086237 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com> wrote:
A RAID 0 SSD will be nearly as fast and in m= y experience you are rarely running a RAM preview in AE and doing something= else I/O heavy at the same time, so that saturation won=92t happen in AE t= hat often.

I have an OWC Accelsior here which I think is basically this.

I find th= at caching in the background is disk-bound with multi-layer, large-format c= omps. Playing back the composite preview is nowhere near as demanding as ac= tually writing the individual caches for each layer-frame in the comp in th= e first place.

Walter Soyka = =A0| =A0Keen Live
Email=A0walter@keenlive.com
Office 845.790.0813=

--089e013a1f164d170604f0086237--