Return-Path: Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.40] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5372704 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:25:41 +0100 Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Qltr1n00E0vp7WLA4mWNCu; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:30:22 +0000 Received: from HPZ200 ([24.10.59.135]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id QmWM1n00C2v3gNo8RmWMdD; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:30:21 +0000 Message-ID: <387D9FDD68BC45F68B1AAEC8098DCB92@HPZ200> From: "Dan Ebberts" To: "After Effects Mail List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [AE] scale expression Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:30:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1392071422; bh=UoITqW1vgh4XxSdwF9KSaC8kLzgVHHn3CTmPhkJmp/U=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=VWzwhZ3SN9D9qPIuSfLKcYKHunpNUetYrcobj2NgAUTWAJYNlbhxKJZAFEsCo6lnS 9VHoKIFcKRI/0gCKKJfat2sxNJKCW8Z5b/MAxtPyccuAboHsFXb66Tvgw1PQZD5udk 56/sGst/oK6l5hWKAkFyvq1qZ4sI2FQqHolwTmxZNrPDTOZwxHMBrrZjAqfE7nnK1G ybu+Az3+4nezQPPjXozKVKoRqqEnkkSQv0rLbmFrj7qvntpyhQSQsBc9X41aqk/fBx hWH/Rrk+hNE2pbtmPPDCCBsEIaTuzHfgeQ90riaqSHZuOwtfcWDJImvs/r3PBGTDxa KCZDojL5qVDxw== Does Layer A have scale keyframes? If so, would it make sense for Layer B to follow Layer A after a particular keyframe (like last or next-to-last)? Dan -----Original Message----- From: Rachel Max Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 2:18 PM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] scale expression That’s good Dan but the Layer B isn’t decaying properly because it needs to go below 100 for that. I was thinking of making it time based but I’d still be in the same boat. Thanks, Rachel On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Dan Ebberts wrote: > This should case layer B's scale to follow Layer A, only when A's scale > is larger than B's: > > s = thisComp.layer("Layer A").transform.scale; > [Math.max(s[0],value[0]),Math.max(s[1],value[1])] > > Dan > > -----Original Message----- From: Rachel Max > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 12:01 PM > To: After Effects Mail List > Subject: [AE] scale expression > > Happy Monday, > > I have layer A that is scaling from 0 to 100 - and then has a nice decay > thanks to an expression from Dan. > > I have layer B that I’d like to be synced up with layer A (going past 100 > and then have the decay) - however layer be is already on the screen and I > only want to the scale past 100 and then bak to 100 with the decay. > > What would you suggest dear kind list? > > Thanks, > Rachel > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to