Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5383277 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:07:17 +0100 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kp14so17255293pab.37 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rze8pu5Ay60T+rIK8EaYJUQRAbaIwHc3GlqgQjOJQcc=; b=tUJz5VcORQAHEpBeWdAdfa2qdJ24+HjSH5BaE+szULdNCpG4a8CdxhdPwuUcYkDShJ Va/qK6FciG417HkZX4+3/pzd7nyW8hJcdKVGofO52ihCNLXNA10RFbGDJUqg5143+utr lMnoMP4234HkN5xgABU5gicSIyb6vjOVi0ITLMAX587GRVyGGeV1MtDtXe4J0GnEHFOA iJe91ZWNFiJ3OTb0HldIBpixlSiJr/BnYO7aZA0FPF8kkZDjgT8iznukE55aJorKF8U1 koH38Ye4JzzTX9IryWXEUrKmJBz1cJES6VhP+Ne4GU7GXsR5blQjcPV4AFdUUxHvgoVJ OY6g== X-Received: by 10.68.197.133 with SMTP id iu5mr35573339pbc.132.1392757637805; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from Robs-Mac-Attack.local (c-67-171-136-108.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [67.171.136.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm59056570pbg.4.2014.02.18.13.07.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5303CB87.2030001@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:07:19 -0800 From: Robert Houghton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Re[2]: [AE] generate water in AE References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Oh I know, compared to other particle generators it's really well featured. I love small companies that really care about their product. I was among the first folks to use Eyeon Fusion when it came out in 97 or 98 I think and I loved the communication. This might actually force me to upgrade my Cinema 4D 13 Broadcast license although I've been working on finding gigs that can make that upgrade pay for itself. After Effects pays for itself so very easily. I should revise that "waiting for a deal" comment to better say "potentially waiting for an NAB deal or my taxes to get figured out, whichever comes first" :) -Rob On 2/18/14, 1:01 PM, Robert W. Walker wrote: > IMO it's already a deal. It is incredibly powerful, updated often, and > their support is terrific. Love X-Particles. Here is a comprehensive, > very informative review: > http://www.cafedownloads.com/reviews/xparticles/index.html > > Robert W. Walker > Los Angeles > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [AE] Re[2]: [AE] generate water in AE >> From: brian@totaltraining.com >> Date: Tue, February 18, 2014 3:49 pm >> To: "After Effects Mail List" >> >> >> That's really impressive. >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Robert Houghton" >> To: "After Effects Mail List" >> Sent: 2/18/2014 3:35:28 PM >> Subject: Re: [AE] generate water in AE >> >>> While not as realistic as Realflow. Xparticles has been getting rather >>> powerful lately. It's on my must buy list, just waiting for a deal :). >>> http://www.x-particle.com/html/gallery.htm >>> >>> -Robert >>> >>> On 2/18/14, 12:22 PM, Lou Wirth wrote: >>>> Thanks Jeff and thanks to all with suggestions. It appears this is >>>> not an easy design to create so I will move on to other ideas. I was >>>> thinking of this as an opening title sequence for a particular >>>> documentary. There are other ways to go but this one popped in my >>>> head. Fusion is the closest to doing what I was thinking of. >>>> >>>> thanks again. >>>> >>>> Lou >>>> Lou Wirth Productions >>>> 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522 >>>> Corte Madera, CA 94925 >>>> www.louwirth.com >>>> 415-924-9411p >>>> >>>> >>>> > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to