Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.216.50] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5383415 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:52:31 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so23917804qab.23 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=totaltraining.com; s=google; h=from:to:subject:date:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:user-agent; bh=mSYm2XPBfw9yD9RCiU0Doeh2OQeZE/5V87egvNSJeaI=; b=ikL/U6zhE9eB4ZU1u/7/qifO8YpDIYJixmL2T9eB1Q74BYvMF71mBbffVh8sSq1yxg aQ389BRgDiu9u34TPOxT7IAq8aXekId+SK1p8rI0lEKQb9Z7nP6TZAaYYtNxiE8uI3rM 2wlLG1BeODO/jcJGXfSBX0wINQkD9hPyDE9Jg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:content-type:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:user-agent; bh=mSYm2XPBfw9yD9RCiU0Doeh2OQeZE/5V87egvNSJeaI=; b=f94Ku1e2wjs1k30xHvmPr0OPO6KjSt7wN3WBaSpFQwKlJuLMCFyWowTpEcU1ds4So4 rnUZ5xcWjBql9exes3+PzjDDp2ZL2FYu6XPPtTouT/+4kNByxaM0rVNi3MMq70vm7GPK 9zqD11noKiRvqeKo3ctWXIEuhmuelGFScYuhXR+ojT7R6eiXnxL1uCROhPRRneZ7YlFp pX1WEhBLNlsKsdBnjKBHuhvdfZHdRyKdqTrtO6RwAmO19mrrwZ+c9fXTkutaayfMR0Ch AMbrhqHbYYVk+wxeScg717wdf0YTcTRoRGFS0/3GyHJcJl9xbK7yOoHHscU2eGllWUUA 95Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHmki6xqtUrMkEun88AsqQklmi4qtkTYpKOoXqLv5qyk5IJInVWLcOrLCPEbp01hqojyIl X-Received: by 10.140.100.240 with SMTP id s103mr43671525qge.38.1392763952305; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.18] (pool-108-41-82-35.nycmny.fios.verizon.net. [108.41.82.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm59643548qat.6.2014.02.18.14.52.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:52:27 -0800 (PST) From: brian@totaltraining.com To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: Re[2]: [AE] Fwd: PS Gradient Map counterpart in AE? Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:52:38 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------=_MB10696EA7-501B-4238-825C-640FEF39F331" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: brian@totaltraining.com User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.19861.0 --------=_MB10696EA7-501B-4238-825C-640FEF39F331 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Send me any questions if you issues with Colorama. I know it pretty=20 well. Brian ------ Original Message ------ From: "Roei Tzoref" To: "After Effects Mail List" Sent: 2/18/2014 5:42:20 PM Subject: Re: [AE] Fwd: PS Gradient Map counterpart in AE? >thanks guys. I will use colorama if that's my best option, I just=20 >wanted to make sure. > > >On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:16 AM, scott.aelist = =20 >wrote: >>I've always found colorama to be a bit fiddly and difficult to use. I=20 >>used to use Image Lounge color map but I don't think they make it=20 >>anymore. >>If you only need 3 colors you can use tritone... otherwise I think=20 >>colorama is your only option. >> >> >>On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, wrote: >>>Start with Colorama. >>> >>>------ Original Message ------ >>>From: "Roei Tzoref" >>>To: "After Effects Mail List" >>>Sent: 2/18/2014 4:59:33 PM >>>Subject: [AE] Fwd: PS Gradient Map counterpart in AE? >>> >>>>Hi guys. >>>>would you be kind enough to recommend a matching counter part >>>>for photoshop's gradient map adjustment layer? >>>> >>>>I looked online and and found post that recommend Colorama >>>>but the results are very different and it feels like an overkill=20 >>>>(after numerous tweaks of course) >>>>how should I convert this simple linear gradient >>>>like this using this monster...? >>>> >>>>it seems that if you are planning to do a color grading and move >>>>later to after effects that you should avoid completely the use >>>>of gradient maps because you would have to create it from scratch >>>>am I right or am I right? >>>> >>>> >> > --------=_MB10696EA7-501B-4238-825C-640FEF39F331 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Send me any questions if you issues with Colorama. I know it pretty= well.
 
Brian
------ Original Message ------
From: "Roei Tzoref" <yooofi@gma= il.com>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: 2/18/2014 5:42:20 PM
Subject: Re: [AE] Fwd: PS Gradient Map counterpart in AE?
 
thanks guys. I will use colorama if that's my best option,= I just wanted to make sure.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:16 AM, scott.aelist = <scott.aelist@= gmail.com> wrote:
I've always found colorama to be a bit fiddly and difficult= to use. I used to use Image = Lounge color map but I don't think they make it anymore.=20
If you only need 3 colors you can use tritone... otherwise I think = colorama is your only option.


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, &= lt;brian@totaltraining.com&g= t; wrote:
Start with Colorama.
 
------ Original Message ------
From: "Roei Tzoref" <yooofi@gma= il.com>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: 2/18/2014 4:59:33 PM
Subject: [AE] Fwd: PS Gradient Map counterpart in AE?
 
Hi guys.=20
would you be kind enough to recommend a matching counter part
for photoshop's gradient map adjustment layer? 

I looked online and and found post that recommend Colorama
but the results are very different and it feels like an overkill (afte= r numerous tweaks of course)
how should I convert this simple linear gradient
like this u= sing this monster...?

it seems that if you are planning to do a color grading and move
later to after effects that you should avoid completely the use
of gradient maps because you would have to create it from scratch
am I right or am I right?


<= /BLOCKQUOTE>


--------=_MB10696EA7-501B-4238-825C-640FEF39F331--