Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5389367 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:39:01 +0100 Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id lg15so3644424vcb.40 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:39:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tvjhP42fmC9tr1ovrhGpiu6PNGIYP+z0Z++hKpDO4jM=; b=htx49ICcgFvQdEzzwarhXqZNWrJmmRvjKOGaoGQyiQj6EeJ+31B9auxh8Wt9QnKHX6 f2OVycXxUXI8LzYHpHTzEic14EFPtWjhMe3nFlH+oWndzE3QqCq2mn9L54sTN376uJf7 RdtkaEXU+rpoOyln2rgN7ybUtEgCgSjBJ/lIWCaagDwIWv99GtORKklby0q4BibY46X4 QoPKaxp89Wa9HGivExh3oouEQtWbz6LL5cpaXegjvnTTZY+VZFy/zcXXsZfzVZl6Zz4J 2w0DxDns7iPTkmevSTyS3+zndZoXVAWbDe/q0qFN5Q/U5vi5CW+PYtfjMoitE4uxI4Rv jGEg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1SPyLwuqDB0Kof1yl5cJtLUdloYxUgTFnXfii4xX4v2qCPFXjlR9QCtvT8kXMdsOSzamk X-Received: by 10.52.104.68 with SMTP id gc4mr1238865vdb.2.1393339156223; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:39:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.182.67 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:38:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Kjettrup Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:38:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Motion tracking To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136aa9875719804f33c0d04 --001a1136aa9875719804f33c0d04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My experience with the built in 3d tracker in AE has been very mixed. Using it on some hand held footage just to test it out it has worked ok good. But each time i wanted to use it on real projects it has failed to give me acceptable results, and have gone back to Syntheyes, that tracks way faster and more accurate, and the camera generated is much closer to the real camera move. So my advice would be to try the built in first, but do have a backup plan to either purchase another 3dtracker (maybe the multi versatile Mocha Pro with the camera tracker would be better than standard AE even?) and learn the basics of that or hire a guy/girl with access to one to do the track for you. Robert Helle people, I will start a exciting motion tracking assignment in a week. The footage will be shot by a Drone. We will film a large open field where there eventually be 3D buildings. So some motion tracking and some 3D work. Would the 3D camera tracker inside of AE be sufficient or should I try an other one? And do I need tracker markers on the field? I am new at this and every tip is very welcome. Cheers, Anthony +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to --001a1136aa9875719804f33c0d04 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My experience with the built in 3d tracker = in AE has been very mixed.=A0

Using it on some hand held footage just to test it out it ha= s worked ok good. But each time i wanted to use it on real projects it has = failed to give me acceptable results, and have gone back to Syntheyes, that= tracks way faster and more accurate, and the camera generated is much clos= er to the real camera move.

So my advice would be to try the built in first, but do have= a backup plan to either purchase another 3dtracker (maybe the multi versat= ile Mocha Pro with the camera tracker would be better than standard AE even= ?) and learn the basics of that or hire a guy/girl with access to one to do= the track for you.

Robert

ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
--001a1136aa9875719804f33c0d04--