Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5390591 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:33:03 +0100 Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id c9so1914522qcz.26 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:33:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=nwyWYJYRupYBKO4gU0rg3Uji3AoZh27K0tdsuC2zH5A=; b=yE4hsbWXhBsLexjZH3w68lxn+TExpfGKQQxUOvy/hMt0fPviXtGQLH1mKX4+nV5WZw Yd+OkRjZp6uYUpuDDhUfDs6/O404w/caUJjiksYt9o9byawa3ucDvYhk2/jS+IgtcX4w TZ/r3kQv05gNKv8sw0grAXVA7mqqG7uEgJsYsjPd9W4rMq6FI4uDX6f/dQ0jc0Ku3TAO J0P4ZOagS/iBjejfG1FcXXGMW25ZJKa3cEY7eSrPXz787frnVpT6b/4F540ehbENjIG+ TtKVYBTqJKf4S0I/IILhl8rCk63xBSarx5MumsC+60jI4R1oxJMoeg0bMiRvvethX9ZO kzWg== X-Received: by 10.224.151.82 with SMTP id b18mr4214165qaw.102.1393439599199; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:33:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.53.66 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:32:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Hillary Knox Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:32:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] AE CC and Mavericks To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149ced653894904f3537075 --089e0149ced653894904f3537075 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What about working with higher resolution (e.g. 4k) files? Theoretically the 6 GB in the Titan should make that a lot less painful(?) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > Robert, from my own experience, the gtx titan is not signifigantly faster > than the gtx 570. In fact a better upgrade would be to a gtx 580 with 3gb= . > You would not have to upgrade to mavericks (which really isnt a huge upda= te > anyway) and the gtx 580 actually is faster than the titan for CUDA > processing. > > The benefit of the titan is that it can drive four monitors and has much > better openGL performance. The main benefit woukd be in gaming and 3d > viewports for c4d and maya. > > I have both cards in two workstations and have seen this empirically. > -TG > > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Robert W. Walker > wrote: > >> I should explain more clearly - >> >> Yes the 570 we have is a CUDA card - I am looking to upgrade to a Titan, >> which apparently requires 10.9.x Mavericks to function at all. I have >> been Googling around for information on how well AE and PPro are working >> on Mavericks and wanted to check here also. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert W. Walker >> Los Angeles >> >> >> > -------- Original Message -------- >> > Subject: Re: [AE] AE CC and Mavericks >> > From: David Baud >> > Date: Wed, February 26, 2014 12:58 pm >> > To: "After Effects Mail List" >> > >> > >> > The nVidia 570 GTX is a CUDA card. Maybe you meant the ATI Radeon HD >> 5770? >> > >> > I have the GTX 570 but I have not done too much work under Mavericks >> yet, so I cannot tell you how stable/speedy it is=E2=80=A6 or not! >> > >> > David Baud >> > K O S M O S P R O D U C T i O N S >> > david@kosmos-productions.com >> > www.kosmos-productions.com >> > >> > On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:43 , Robert W. Walker >> wrote: >> > >> > > I am researching a GPU upgrade for a Mac Pro 5,1 (OSX 10.8.4) from a >> GTX >> > > 570 to a CUDA card that requires OSX 10.9.2 Mavericks. >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >> > > > -- > _____________________________ > VFX & Motion Graphic Artist > teddygage dot com > > --089e0149ced653894904f3537075 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What about working with higher resolution (e.g. 4k) files? Theoretically th= e 6 GB in the Titan should make that a lot less painful(?)

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Teddy Gage <= teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Robert, from my own experience, the g= tx titan is not signifigantly faster than the gtx 570. In fact a better upg= rade would be to a gtx 580 with 3gb. You would not have to upgrade to maver= icks (which really isnt a huge update anyway) and the gtx 580 actually is f= aster=C2=A0than the titan for CUDA processing.=C2=A0=20

The benefit of the titan is that it can drive four monitors and has mu= ch better openGL performance. The main benefit woukd be in gaming and 3d vi= ewports for c4d and maya.=C2=A0

I have both cards in two workstations and have seen this empirically.= =C2=A0
-TG=20


On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Robert W. Walker= <robertw@w= alkersound.com> wrote:
I should explain more clearly -
Yes the 570 we have is a CUDA card - I am looking to upgrade to a Titan,<= br> which apparently requires 10.9.x Mavericks to function at all. =C2=A0I have=
been Googling around for information on how well AE and PPro are workin= g
on Mavericks and wanted to check here also.

Thanks,

Robe= rt W. Walker
Los Angeles


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subj= ect: Re: [AE] AE CC and Mavericks
> From: David Baud <david.bau= d@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, February 26, 2014 12:58 pm
> T= o: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv&g= t;
>
>
> The nVidia 570 GTX is a CUDA card. Maybe you meant the= ATI Radeon HD 5770?
>
> I have the GTX 570 but I have not done= too much work under Mavericks yet, so I cannot tell you how stable/speedy = it is=E2=80=A6 or not!
>
> David Baud
> K O S M O S =C2=A0 =C2=A0 P R O D U C T i O= N S
> david@kosmos-productions.com
> www.kosmos-productions.com
>
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:43 , Robert W. Walker <robertw@walkersound= .com> wrote:
>
> > I am researching a GPU upgrade for= a Mac Pro 5,1 (OSX 10.8.4) from a GTX
> > 570 to a CUDA card that= requires OSX 10.9.2 Mavericks.

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-= list-off@media-motion.tv>


--
_____________________________
VFX & M= otion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com


--089e0149ced653894904f3537075--