much appreciated feedback!
For what its worth my findings on ebay at the moment show that just
a single gtx 580 3Gb is more expensive than the 760 4gb
On 28-Feb-14 21:46, Teddy Gage wrote:
I've said this before, but you can get two gtx 580s
in SLI for around $300. In the dual config they are faster for
CUDA than a single Titan. Look for the 3GB editions on ebay.
Otherwise 770 probably not worth the $100 premium over the
760 for a 15-20% increase in speed, unless you play a lot of
games or do a ton of raytracing.
trying not to
high-jack this thread,
on the windows platform would the GeForce GTX770 4GB
justify the cost over the equivalent GTX760 4GB for AE or
is it not worth it?
additionally any other suggestion at a sub 300 price range
:-)
On 28-Feb-14 19:56, Teddy Gage wrote:
>CUDA
processing on the Titan should be
significantly faster than a single 580.�
Ah I was thinking of dual 580s. Can't wait to
add a second Titan when they get cheaper.
>an
animated/changing environment map layer...When
you have little VRAM, there's a lot of time
wasted uploading and clearing textures to and
from the VRAM
Consider me educated. I haven't played around with
environment maps in AE raytrace much.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at
7:08 AM, Todd Kopriva <kopriva@adobe.com>
wrote:
One
place where more VRAM helps a lot is
when you have an animated/changing
environment map layer. When you have
little VRAM, there's a lot of time
wasted uploading and clearing textures
to and from the VRAM; with a lot of
VRAM, more can be held on the GPU at
once.
�
Also,
plug-ins like Element 3D that rely on
the GPU perform better (and crash
less) with more VRAM.