Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: [AE] Render questions AE vs. AME in CC12
From: Daniel Monro <dmonro@mac.com>
In-reply-to: <list-5394588@media-motion.tv>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 07:52:02 -0500
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <2C534D16-1FEB-4F82-B44F-9E85540352AA@mac.com>
References: <list-5394588@media-motion.tv>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>

I've noticed this, too, but I'm working in AE at the same time that AME =
is rendering, so the slowness is expected. I believe that AME defers to =
AE, does it not? Does it perhaps defer to other software that might be =
running?
D


On SaturdayMar 12014, at 7:44 AM, Dean Forss <deanforss@gmail.com> =
wrote:

> I have been doing some testing recently on rendering in AME vs. AE
> (CC12) and have found some interesting results. One project took
> 7:43:00 in AME but when I rendered with the exact same settings in AE
> it took 4:22:00. I am on a mac pro 12 core machine with 128gigs ram,
> GTX680 and a boot SSD for cache.
>=20
> So I took the project to my home PC (aptly and affectionately named
> BLAZE) running windows 8.1 and I experienced the same difference in
> render times. AME is just slower for some reason no matter what render
> option I pick.
>=20
> Can anyone shed light on which option to choose in render mode when
> you can choose open CL, Cuda or software only in AME? considering the
> above mac pro I am referring to?
>=20
> Is there anyway to get the .epr presets I have built in AME into AE's
> render que?
>=20
> TIA,
>=20
> --=20
> Dean Forss
> Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer
> Direct 727.277.5370
>=20
> Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take
> risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping
> you!
>=20
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>