| ||||||||||
| I've noticed this, too, but I'm working in AE at the same time that AME is rendering, so the slowness is expected. I believe that AME defers to AE, does it not? Does it perhaps defer to other software that might be running? D On SaturdayMar 12014, at 7:44 AM, Dean Forss <deanforss@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been doing some testing recently on rendering in AME vs. AE > (CC12) and have found some interesting results. One project took > 7:43:00 in AME but when I rendered with the exact same settings in AE > it took 4:22:00. I am on a mac pro 12 core machine with 128gigs ram, > GTX680 and a boot SSD for cache. > > So I took the project to my home PC (aptly and affectionately named > BLAZE) running windows 8.1 and I experienced the same difference in > render times. AME is just slower for some reason no matter what render > option I pick. > > Can anyone shed light on which option to choose in render mode when > you can choose open CL, Cuda or software only in AME? considering the > above mac pro I am referring to? > > Is there anyway to get the .epr presets I have built in AME into AE's > render que? > > TIA, > > -- > Dean Forss > Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer > Direct 727.277.5370 > > Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take > risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping > you! > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
