Return-Path: <walter@keenlive.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 5394615 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:55:31 +0100
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so3449138obc.40
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 04:55:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=dttoUpI+snRgEn205CHwXXLD+/uDmfPzXb9XvyiXsjY=;
        b=UtPzHz9y4zw2+ahXFGZUs+aHowo8eRIgV+3cj5c0lIUuTIApuedtchPme1LiP3CI26
         I8ltkbzt38db5RPsMa9jj9P8zwN7e7d1hx0jA2L4FHGMybatlSphkfbXYpx0lr8iRcS7
         Yz9VFVtsyZobwqK3Cx+PAnA5DFzc3sqHRnEFYcZFCRTfITOAQ0QIJ7XqTKr9opyujl9R
         03sPjY9J/wDQ2qx9Oih57wj+UdnAjxiZmru+hoqH0oJI8aBC9z0Rn6F628Bj2balUVHY
         AwKfCCEYSJowSAU1SEWMm/AiYQW4MuJGwf9M4t8WkN8tRrUzgr+zZ7FonEJN5lCet6Cd
         JQig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhABFLuHAc1USv5eV61Db3qUlFcSjqewu3aWgvZ/8rP2ArN5vTNe5tpuE9YgFNmZ2GV6xf
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.142.166 with SMTP id rx6mr1894101oeb.57.1393678551403;
 Sat, 01 Mar 2014 04:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.74.232 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 04:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.74.232 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 04:55:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-5394588@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-5394588@media-motion.tv>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 07:55:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEcMUeT0NFY9VtQg9yEEFX8hTZ6SfRdOhdqgCWYFS9_aQDJJJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Render questions AE vs. AME in CC12
From: Walter Soyka <walter@keenlive.com>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e0b29fce4de04f38b125e

--047d7b2e0b29fce4de04f38b125e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

AME does not exploit Ae's multiprocessing feature. This explains the
difference in render times that you are seeing.

You cannot import an .epr into Ae. For best performance, I usually render a
lossless intermediate out of Ae (with multiprocessing on) and encode with
AME via watch folders.

Walter Soyka    |    Keen Live
Email walter@keenlive.com
On Mar 1, 2014 7:44 AM, "Dean Forss" <deanforss@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been doing some testing recently on rendering in AME vs. AE
> (CC12) and have found some interesting results. One project took
> 7:43:00 in AME but when I rendered with the exact same settings in AE
> it took 4:22:00. I am on a mac pro 12 core machine with 128gigs ram,
> GTX680 and a boot SSD for cache.
>
> So I took the project to my home PC (aptly and affectionately named
> BLAZE) running windows 8.1 and I experienced the same difference in
> render times. AME is just slower for some reason no matter what render
> option I pick.
>
> Can anyone shed light on which option to choose in render mode when
> you can choose open CL, Cuda or software only in AME? considering the
> above mac pro I am referring to?
>
> Is there anyway to get the .epr presets I have built in AME into AE's
> render que?
>
> TIA,
>
> --
> Dean Forss
> Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer
> Direct 727.277.5370
>
> Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take
> risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping
> you!
>
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>

--047d7b2e0b29fce4de04f38b125e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">AME does not exploit Ae&#39;s multiprocessing feature. This =
explains the difference in render times that you are seeing.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">You cannot import an .epr into Ae. For best performance, I u=
sually render a lossless intermediate out of Ae (with multiprocessing on) a=
nd encode with AME via watch folders.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Walter Soyka=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0 Keen Live<br>
Email <a href=3D"mailto:walter@keenlive.com">walter@keenlive.com</a></p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mar 1, 2014 7:44 AM, &quot;Dean Forss&quot; &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:deanforss@gmail.com">deanforss@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote=
:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have been doing some testing recently on rendering in AME vs. AE<br>
(CC12) and have found some interesting results. One project took<br>
7:43:00 in AME but when I rendered with the exact same settings in AE<br>
it took 4:22:00. I am on a mac pro 12 core machine with 128gigs ram,<br>
GTX680 and a boot SSD for cache.<br>
<br>
So I took the project to my home PC (aptly and affectionately named<br>
BLAZE) running windows 8.1 and I experienced the same difference in<br>
render times. AME is just slower for some reason no matter what render<br>
option I pick.<br>
<br>
Can anyone shed light on which option to choose in render mode when<br>
you can choose open CL, Cuda or software only in AME? considering the<br>
above mac pro I am referring to?<br>
<br>
Is there anyway to get the .epr presets I have built in AME into AE&#39;s<b=
r>
render que?<br>
<br>
TIA,<br>
<br>
--<br>
Dean Forss<br>
Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer<br>
Direct 727.277.5370<br>
<br>
Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take<br>
risks - not to escape today&#39;s life, but to prevent it from escaping<br>
you!<br>
<br>
+---End of message---+<br>
To unsubscribe send any message to &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-=
motion.tv">ae-list-off@media-motion.tv</a>&gt;<br>
</blockquote></div>

--047d7b2e0b29fce4de04f38b125e--