Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv ? Message #53111
From: Walter Soyka <walter@keenlive.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Render questions AE vs. AME in CC12
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 07:55:51 -0500
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>

AME does not exploit Ae's multiprocessing feature. This explains the difference in render times that you are seeing.

You cannot import an .epr into Ae. For best performance, I usually render a lossless intermediate out of Ae (with multiprocessing on) and encode with AME via watch folders.

Walter Soyka    |    Keen Live
Email walter@keenlive.com

On Mar 1, 2014 7:44 AM, "Dean Forss" <deanforss@gmail.com> wrote:
I have been doing some testing recently on rendering in AME vs. AE
(CC12) and have found some interesting results. One project took
7:43:00 in AME but when I rendered with the exact same settings in AE
it took 4:22:00. I am on a mac pro 12 core machine with 128gigs ram,
GTX680 and a boot SSD for cache.

So I took the project to my home PC (aptly and affectionately named
BLAZE) running windows 8.1 and I experienced the same difference in
render times. AME is just slower for some reason no matter what render
option I pick.

Can anyone shed light on which option to choose in render mode when
you can choose open CL, Cuda or software only in AME? considering the
above mac pro I am referring to?

Is there anyway to get the .epr presets I have built in AME into AE's
render que?

TIA,

--
Dean Forss
Technology Consultant, 3D Artist, Interactive Designer
Direct 727.277.5370

Life is a wondrous adventure; embrace it, leave yesterday behind, take
risks - not to escape today's life, but to prevent it from escaping
you!

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster