Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv — Message #53114
From: Todd Kopriva <toddkopriva@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Render questions AE vs. AME in CC12
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 09:33:45 -0800
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
 Message Header

Undecoded Message
As Walter says, the headless version of After Effects that is serving AME over Dynamic Link does not use the GPU or multiple background rendering processes. I recommend the workflow that Walter suggested: rendering a losslessly encoded master file out of After Effects and directing that file to a watch folder to be picked up for transcoding to delivery formats by AME.

On Saturday, March 1, 2014, Walter Soyka <walter@keenlive.com> wrote:

AME does not exploit Ae's multiprocessing feature. This explains the difference in render times that you are seeing.

You cannot import an .epr into Ae. For best performance, I usually render a lossless intermediate out of Ae (with multiprocessing on) and encode with AME via watch folders.



--
--------------------------------
Todd Kopriva
1510 E Alder St
Seattle, WA 98122
(206)437-2296
--------------------------------
"Mobility is more important than motion."
   - György Sebők
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster