Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv — Message #53116
From:
Hillary Knox <hillaryknox@gmail.com>
Subject:
Re: [AE] Render questions AE vs. AME in CC12
Date:
Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:40:59 -0500
To:
After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Lots of people, including myself, are also big fans of BG Renderer:Â http://aescripts.com/bg-renderer/ which can be used in combination with the aforementioned AME workflow.
As Walter says, the headless version of After Effects that is serving AME over Dynamic Link does not use the GPU or multiple background rendering processes. I recommend the workflow that Walter suggested: rendering a losslessly encoded master file out of After Effects and directing that file to a watch folder to be picked up for transcoding to delivery formats by AME.
AME does not exploit Ae's multiprocessing feature. This explains the difference in render times that you are seeing.
You cannot import an .epr into Ae. For best performance, I usually render a lossless intermediate out of Ae (with multiprocessing on) and encode with AME via watch folders.
-- -------------------------------- Todd Kopriva 1510 E Alder St Seattle, WA 98122 (206)437-2296
-------------------------------- "Mobility is more important than motion."
  - György Sebők