Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5407169 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:01:42 +0100 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ur14so20518540igb.2 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:02:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=gG9SZrVldxbT7MJiANbua0hkSFn3D3IqLLwZ2fjjxuY=; b=EV3NOkKo0FWTGGFO9rsZNt3XJk62QBV/NWDXuq+nDaDQjEP25sYhr3fFOW4Qtb3omN HqRpCRfOi8u1wVCXtvJn0KdCfz7tdjttLL5VmT0kB0+T6bXxlwfUPAv+1K1KNfRsIZc2 BgpGW0cZ+qK8nKP1/BtsUDWV1RAnyyCUMDVvtUifNok8kKbnIgcyGvQ4v57zVMg+iISg XKzzUHKMtyW1zlkxCZa4m4NneNXCUY/inHQNjn5kqd98tiG+yk7fl6pV7LifiAK+Jp7C 0xxwv3CYAUvJA6ufMlTuiSGQ8bvfyJ/iC018UZw5vnDIhevJ9hSaURoMEIMmisIOxr63 0bsA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHwTJ0AGVu3ENbO6rpEmIoS0A+gM2e0RAACOVrp8mVv4ZjhwkJOqUtclNcelE2Zy9WwvdU X-Received: by 10.50.32.98 with SMTP id h2mr2479218igi.21.1394812946608; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-24-118-184-204.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [24.118.184.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pn6sm20522688igb.4.2014.03.14.09.02.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:02:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Carey Dissmore Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D155F648-1B03-481C-8334-04DC0D6360A4" Message-Id: <9FB64725-CC86-4FB5-8BFC-77FC8884C656@imugonline.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: [AE] time for a system UG Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:01:52 -0500 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) --Apple-Mail=_D155F648-1B03-481C-8334-04DC0D6360A4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 It=92s interesting,=20 While there are certain better performing underpinnings in each OS = release, I think we are reaching the level of maturity on feature sets = where each update seems to have less of those =93OMG I MUST HAVE THAT = NOW=94 features. What matters most is the APIs and new hardware support = that our production apps use=85 carey On Mar 14, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Rob Birnholz = wrote: > Thank you everyone for the advice. I=92m going to move to Mountain = Lion. Mavericks is fine on my laptop, but it was a nightmare when it = came to the new Apple Mail, especially regarding Gmail (I manage several = email accounts, and Gmail is a big one). >=20 > Wish I didn=92t have to update at all, but we live in interesting = times. >=20 > Rob Birnholz > Absolute Motion Graphics, Inc. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mar 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Rob Birnholz = wrote: >=20 >> So the question is, do I finally move to Mountain Lion or bite the = bullet and go full bore into Mavericks. >=20 --Apple-Mail=_D155F648-1B03-481C-8334-04DC0D6360A4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 It=92s = interesting, 
While there are certain better performing = underpinnings in each OS release, I think we are reaching the level of = maturity on feature sets where each update seems to have less of those = =93OMG I MUST HAVE THAT NOW=94 features.  What matters most is the = APIs and new hardware support that our production apps = use=85

carey
= --Apple-Mail=_D155F648-1B03-481C-8334-04DC0D6360A4--