Return-Path: Received: from p3plwbeout04-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.224] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5407305 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:35:50 +0100 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.244]) by p3plwbeout04-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id dXce1n0025GyNsw01Xcej7; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:36:38 -0700 X-SID: dXce1n0025GyNsw01 Received: (qmail 24262 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2014 19:36:38 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 142.129.187.88 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.47 Message-Id: <20140314123637.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.f66a355bc2.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] Quick poll: Do you use an SSD for AE =?UTF-8?Q?Cache=3F=20How=20?= =?UTF-8?Q?much=20do=20you=20have=20allocated=3F?= Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:36:37 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Yeah, I was checking actual space available and it was showing up at=0A10-1= 2gb - truly low!=0A=0ARobert W. Walker=0ALos Angeles=0A=0A> -------- Origin= al Message --------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] Quick poll: Do you use an SSD for= AE Cache? How much=0A> do you have allocated?=0A> From: Teddy Gage =0A> Date: Fri, March 14, 2014 3:11 pm=0A> To: "After Effects= Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> I get that all the time= , it's actually a bit misleading. Whereas I had=0A> always thought it meant= more or less "disk full" - what it really means is=0A> that "you do not ha= ve the full 120 GB you have allocated on top of the=0A> current cached file= s". Usually I go to check the cache disk and it's only=0A> about half full.= That being said it's quite easy to fill up 350 GB or more=0A> very quickly= . The whole reason for setting up this benchmark came from=0A> wanting to s= ee which of my SSD's was best used as an AE cache and which for=0A> project= files, as dry read/write numbers don't always tell the whole story.=0A> = =0A> =0A> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Robert W. Walker=0A> wrote:=0A> =0A> > I had 120bg each on two workstations but on= e of them is constantly=0A> > giving us a "not enough space" warning -- jus= t upgraded that SSD to a=0A> > 750, reserving about 500 for cache now.=0A> = >=0A> > Robert W. Walker=0A> > Los Angeles=0A> >=0A> > > -------- Original = Message --------=0A> > > Subject: [AE] Quick poll: Do you use an SSD for AE= Cache? How much do=0A> > > you have allocated?=0A> > > From: Teddy Gage =0A> > > Date: Fri, March 14, 2014 2:53 pm=0A> > > To: "= After Effects Mail List" =0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > > = Trying to get a rough average (or median) for a new AE benchmark I'm=0A> > = > working on. Part of the test would be SSD cached frame retrieval speed,= =0A> > and=0A> > > overall BG cache speed. One goal is to have a preset amo= unt of cache=0A> > filled=0A> > > in the test project from which to establi= sh a baseline, but I'd like to=0A> > > know what most people are working wi= th.=0A> > > -TG=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > > --=0A> > > ________________________= _____=0A> > > VFX & Motion Graphic Artist=0A> > > teddygage dot com=0A> >= =0A> > +---End of message---+=0A> > To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> >=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> -- =0A> ________________= _____________=0A> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist=0A> teddygage dot com