Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5415437 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:04:53 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j15so5957825qaq.2 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lVsuVwWjBPI4jzrlTAkt1rHqQC8Pm+x6o/soWuLHRRs=; b=yCn25Bx1WpaLX1dIhOGEn9YOO7+s3LtwTJAskSdt0KSNNPQRLc+09QLDJDlhHAye5+ 9Bebsp+6jpf+Va2zYtLpTnqakcKq9Bb0p/Owj3a0pQ4yiXND8KoIgiRsP2v3cjoCB5Fv Gb0Cz7tE0wQp2W9/5D7s2XcUy0c/ucEmCDCZClI1eaLUtOwP/Q+agFb8lg7n57zjVTfB xjtw/+5Fvvtyx7yb+Qx75nvnsVa5ukr4AEAy/t52zU9/gsRWaTqAFhEm83QLhWpIxMFu uiqz3FdeNcoPuKd+FyWFUfotUBaEAEhg3mCdpDnXokuX82DAAdVeq8+8Ssk/vg1tSZHh trnA== X-Received: by 10.140.84.39 with SMTP id k36mr28443904qgd.51.1395695161228; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.106] (c-67-171-136-108.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [67.171.136.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j91sm23458194qgj.19.2014.03.24.14.06.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53309E36.5070603@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:05:58 -0700 From: Robert Houghton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Who uses global performance cache in AE and best way to set this up? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I've got a fairly simple set up in my office for After Effects CC work: Intel 980x CPU 24GB Ram Geforce GTX 580 3TB system drive (2 partitions, one for Win 7 64 and 1 for media) 120GB SSD Recently I've been thinking of using the 120GB SSD for a boot drive instead of my cache drive. I figure once everything is installed on it the speed I would gain from opening software and system operation would offset the loss of space for the cache or elimination of it entirely. Has anyone had any experience with this? Of course I could just buy another SSD but since this system is approaching 4 years old I would prefer not to throw more money at it. It would be nice to squeeze another year out of it. -Rob