Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5423075 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:23:34 +0200 Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id mc6so356606lab.41 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=UTVkwvSyKBwZR6fFmW59A9WW9Mx3hYLNOdiYU+K+SFc=; b=clFEbG4okLqzlN0xEzWWFMoD/vPOjTOWrHenGKNcT/da402viZrb1CXgv74HAfJD1K /vi8k/vDBFPUK94HOZ/ahDeMf/AGvGFL2RD8PS5XHk9e5ePDkx9iaKBxgJHtjIk95cvO TwylPPNelW4AFRxf8w8xcOy8f/3E1T7SB5gA+txh4bpzVvVgSHL8y6YKj+U3MA7NlvGi on9Y+yb9zgbyChAO4EkibOPl6TnpJZt38R8IYGCscdHb+8R9A4in1ki8inaTCciX2xMx D+vRWhSocFNZ2Gp1qMbz0fJBRZmOuq9MEHdvnT63scM1tzctiuVVl7rhnV5M6JEtj5Ei I5MA== X-Received: by 10.112.56.148 with SMTP id a20mr627723lbq.44.1396455900240; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.134.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Byron Nash Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 12:24:40 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] AfterBenchCC - A free total After Effects benchmarking suite for CPU/GPU/RAM To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113393c8e0e23c04f611b9c3 --001a113393c8e0e23c04f611b9c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll test my PC > with a 680 next and see how it compares. > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: > >> Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other tests on the titan? My guess >> is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe the pci >> bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support all the titan throughput? Or >> could be that the pc drivers are simply much more optimized? >> >> What kind of numbers do you get from this test >> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 >> >> Should be around 4-6 minutes i think >> >> Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get around 110 - 120 FPS >> in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on overclock >> >> >> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash wrote: >> >>> I just ran the test on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan >>> GPU. I only got 12min on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower >>> than your PC with the Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting >>> the performance in that GPU heavy comp? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>> >>> Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier once I get more >>> info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.com or on >>> twitter @teddyrocksteady >>> >>> http://goo.gl/JrNIXd >>> >>> Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers? Should only >>> take about 20 minutes >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint wrote: >>> >>> Hey Teddy, >>> >>> Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the results? >>> >>> Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page with the submit >>> functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when researching new >>> processors to see how they fair in the benchmark. >>> >>> ///Greg Balint >>> //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer >>> /321.514.4839 >>> delRAZOR.com/ >>> >>> On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" wrote: >>> >>> New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that your machine >>> will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project >>> >>> https://vimeo.com/90489125 >>> >>> Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/ >>> >>> It's not really recommended for systems older than 2 years, it may take >>> a long time to run, especially with older GPUs. However it is broken into >>> several 3-5 minute tests, so you can pick and choose which test you want to >>> run without demanding too much time or resources. I highly recommend the >>> fractal noise CPU test to get a clear idea of system performance in a >>> single run. >>> >>> Here are my current results, the rest of our machines will be added soon. >>> >>> "IRONMAN" >>> 4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off >>> >>> MP OFF: 2:28 >>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:12 >>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:26 >>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55 >>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:18 >>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12 >>> Cineware: 8:51 >>> Element 3D: 5:02 >>> >>> >>> "The flash" >>> 4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on >>> >>> MP OFF: 2:22 >>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:25 >>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:36 >>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11 >>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:22 >>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15 >>> Cineware: 8:42 >>> Element 3D: na >>> >>> >>> "JACKAL" >>> Late 2013 Macbook pro >>> 2.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, gtx 720m, 1 TB >>> on board SSD, hyperthreading on >>> >>> MP OFF: 2:34 >>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:36 >>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:35 >>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01 >>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:25 >>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23 >>> Cineware: 9:13 >>> Element 3D: na >>> >>> Some really interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet >>> with some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it >>> out! >>> -TG >>> >>> >> >> -- >> _____________________________ >> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist >> teddygage dot com >> >> > --001a113393c8e0e23c04f611b9c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a= PC. I may try to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs.
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

On Wed, Apr 2,= 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:=
Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. = I'll test my PC with a 680 next and see how it compares.


On Wed, Apr 2= , 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote= :
Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other t= ests on the titan? My guess is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the= motherboard, maybe the pci bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support a= ll the titan throughput? Or could be that the pc drivers are simply much mo= re optimized?

What kind of numbers do you get from this test=A0

Should be around 4-6 minutes i think

Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get arou= nd 110 - 120 FPS in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on ov= erclock


On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
I just ran the t= est on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan GPU. I only got 12mi= n on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower than your PC with t= he Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting the performance in= that GPU heavy comp?


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier o= nce I get more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.co= m or on twitter @teddyrocksteady

http://goo.gl/JrNIXd=A0

Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers= ? Should only take about 20 minutes

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint <delr= azoraelist@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Teddy,

Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the results?

Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page wit= h the submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when resea= rching new processors to see how they fair in the benchmark.

///Greg Balint
//Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/
=A0=A0=A0

On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" <<= a>teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that = your machine will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project

Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/After= BenchCC/

It's not really recommended for s= ystems older than 2 years, it may take a long time to run, especially with = older GPUs. However it is broken into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can = pick and choose which test you want to run without demanding too much time = or resources. I highly recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear = idea of system performance in a single run.=A0

Here are my current results, the rest of our machines w= ill be added soon.

"IRONMAN"
4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off

MP OFF: 2:28
4K KEYFRAME: 3:12
4K ENC= ODING H264: 0:26
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55
4K Enco= ding MP4: 0:18
RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12
Cineware: 8:51
Element 3= D: 5:02


"The flash"
=
4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on

MP OFF: 2:22
4K KEYFRAME: 3:25
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:36
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11
4K En= coding MP4: 0:22
RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15
Cineware: 8:= 42
Element 3D: na


"JACKAL&qu= ot;=A0
Late 2013 Macbook pro
=A02.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8= GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, =A0gtx 720m, 1 TB on board SSD, hyperthreadi= ng on

MP OFF: 2:34
4K KEYFRAME: 3:36
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:35
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01
4K En= coding MP4: 0:25
RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23
Cineware: 9= :13
Element 3D: na=A0

Some real= ly interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet with som= e nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it out!
-TG



--
_____________________________=
VFX & M= otion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com



--001a113393c8e0e23c04f611b9c3--