Return-Path: <teddygage@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 5424219 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:58:14 +0200
Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f10so2417131yha.38
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=H9OF6030VHdvMdoSIxdwyD20PpLtT3O+6hzNQD8qkQg=;
        b=unkXjNq2g0SAEshHNJisuCv4MxNngYyy7/UP4ZhN4DBktEIP4gDgTXwU4Bu73rW4XE
         7GthIVUxrdCiQXvv/Uv9xY9oMcNrS3jYoce7hTTf35olY5H5dts1Eg0uuJTR6JwRBb/1
         LnUEFpL2/SnQR+8XpvfwcN8c5YVNwxGVDhz0bB/W/P6rdN6Tra3yvSn32JnXkUlYGrKj
         nmOBs9HZv4geri1qyMRJzvbUyM0SLdCfGbzjc4LGQJ6pYKlExu88EjetuCFRST2NFZf+
         JjxcyJQQ1Op6c8Uy5H52sLeGC5WB0YL3srGoZqcjOJrIwH2ndR3YqooV9/NrZjZxlw29
         N2Nw==
X-Received: by 10.236.141.113 with SMTP id f77mr4919089yhj.128.1396565981126;
 Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.160.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-5423866@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-5423866@media-motion.tv>
From: Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:59:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPdXPWcmoSn7ah=i1K6L9n9zuiaMtfQJB20533nCBNiKvSOckw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] Which output codecs are full 64bit?
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303dd22835e3c604f62b5b61

--20cf303dd22835e3c604f62b5b61
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Looks like .tif sequences actually rendered slower on the benchmark than
the raw QT 422 exports, so it doesn't look like a bottleneck after all.
Something to consider if you render a lot of sequences.
-TG


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:

>      So Stephen Van Vuuren ran the AfterBenchCC<http://www.teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/>benchmark and came up with a good question, one I had not considered. He
> wasn't sure whether the 8 bit 422 raw quicktime export I have set as
> default output in the benchmark was actually 64 bit enabled, as AE has had
> issues in the past with quicktime libraries. I thought those had been
> resolved but maybe not.
>
> So I have two questions:
>
> - Is there a better default codec to render to within AE? I wanted to
> avoid image sequences because the "render and replace usage" feature is
> used several times, and also because it's a bit more complicated for the
> end user. I was trying to keep things as idiot proof as possible.
>
> - What render codecs provide the least bottleneck in terms of output? i.e.
> What outputs are fully threaded and 64 bit enabled? Is the QT 8bit 422
> sufficient? One would think that because the renders do seem to use 100% of
> available resources when exporting that it is, in fact, 64 bit.
>
> I am going to be doing some tests with image sequences and DNX export to
> see what happens
> -TG
>
> --
> _____________________________
> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist
> teddygage dot com
>



-- 
_____________________________
VFX & Motion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com

--20cf303dd22835e3c604f62b5b61
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Looks like .tif sequences actually rendered slower on the =
benchmark than the raw QT 422 exports, so it doesn&#39;t look like a bottle=
neck after all. Something to consider if you render a lot of sequences.=A0<=
div>

-TG</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Teddy Gage <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:teddygage@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">teddygage@gmail.com</a>&g=
t;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><div=
 dir=3D"ltr">=A0 =A0 =A0So Stephen Van Vuuren ran the<a href=3D"http://www.=
teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/" target=3D"_blank"> AfterBenchCC</a> benchmark =
and came up with a good question, one I had not considered. He wasn&#39;t s=
ure whether the 8 bit 422 raw quicktime export I have set as default output=
 in the benchmark was actually 64 bit enabled, as AE has had issues in the =
past with quicktime libraries. I thought those had been resolved but maybe =
not.<div>



<br></div><div>So I have two questions:=A0</div><div><br></div><div>- Is th=
ere a better default codec to render to within AE? I wanted to avoid image =
sequences because the &quot;render and replace usage&quot; feature is used =
several times, and also because it&#39;s a bit more complicated for the end=
 user. I was trying to keep things as idiot proof as possible.</div>



<div><br></div><div>- What render codecs provide the least bottleneck in te=
rms of output? i.e. What outputs are fully threaded and 64 bit enabled? Is =
the QT 8bit 422 sufficient? One would think that because the renders do see=
m to use 100% of available resources when exporting that it is, in fact, 64=
 bit.</div>



<div><br></div><div>I am going to be doing some tests with image sequences =
and DNX export to see what happens</div><div>-TG<br clear=3D"all"><div><br>=
</div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><font size=3D"1">_______________________=
______</font></div>



<div><font style color=3D"#6aa84f" size=3D"1" face=3D"georgia, serif">VFX &=
amp; Motion Graphic Artist<br>teddygage dot com</font></div></div>
</div></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><font size=3D"1">_____________________________</font>=
</div><div><font style=3D"background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" color=3D"#6aa8=
4f" size=3D"1" face=3D"georgia, serif">VFX &amp; Motion Graphic Artist<br>

teddygage dot com</font></div></div>
</div>

--20cf303dd22835e3c604f62b5b61--