Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5425786 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 21:12:51 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id la4so4583832vcb.17 for ; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HcZdifmmRavN7w1kwpSUlW51j4V0V6BEeOAGz4urhL8=; b=wbW/fEO5FslWAyFkp1rBsvxgJsg77akNucmdNAAxGRbeegQzxyBlFQwsvSfzx5nf55 ZAZID+fifUeZ4tB451ouOiZdaqIymtOuz3kOc2RQBItrz13226Kj/I9cYOQlpDtVoJzC MK5RxpNwP1MPnF/icZj5Vs4Id4E0BWcZsrr4E1+V1uVsFVyo91h6oyZujEpzvwukOqSi f6CNATuaeDAGdQsveCREeAhYXTY2OQ+rE9j/cAjYv5bcTwDt0S74ViSAmz3SV8cXrqz1 RuU4ET89v8BOrbZGd4As0BsSuJx7nQd0woBgcP3UsvXvAyy1zShiEj0sdfnOA1jmWisV kpVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.147.16 with SMTP id j16mr9008221vcv.14.1396811664037; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.116.3 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 12:14:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] AfterBenchCC - A free total After Effects benchmarking suite for CPU/GPU/RAM From: Darby Edelen To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3436d20d9f7404f6648f52 --047d7b3436d20d9f7404f6648f52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned. -Darby On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try > to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs. > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > >> Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll test my PC >> with a 680 next and see how it compares. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >> >>> Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other tests on the titan? My guess >>> is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe the pci >>> bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support all the titan throughput? Or >>> could be that the pc drivers are simply much more optimized? >>> >>> What kind of numbers do you get from this test >>> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 >>> >>> Should be around 4-6 minutes i think >>> >>> Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get around 110 - 120 FPS >>> in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on overclock >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash wrote: >>> >>>> I just ran the test on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan >>>> GPU. I only got 12min on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower >>>> than your PC with the Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting >>>> the performance in that GPU heavy comp? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>> >>>> Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier once I get >>>> more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.com or on >>>> twitter @teddyrocksteady >>>> >>>> http://goo.gl/JrNIXd >>>> >>>> Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers? Should only >>>> take about 20 minutes >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Teddy, >>>> >>>> Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the >>>> results? >>>> >>>> Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page with the >>>> submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when researching new >>>> processors to see how they fair in the benchmark. >>>> >>>> ///Greg Balint >>>> //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer >>>> /321.514.4839 >>>> delRAZOR.com/ >>>> >>>> On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" wrote: >>>> >>>> New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that your machine >>>> will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project >>>> >>>> https://vimeo.com/90489125 >>>> >>>> Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/ >>>> >>>> It's not really recommended for systems older than 2 years, it may take >>>> a long time to run, especially with older GPUs. However it is broken into >>>> several 3-5 minute tests, so you can pick and choose which test you want to >>>> run without demanding too much time or resources. I highly recommend the >>>> fractal noise CPU test to get a clear idea of system performance in a >>>> single run. >>>> >>>> Here are my current results, the rest of our machines will be added >>>> soon. >>>> >>>> "IRONMAN" >>>> 4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off >>>> >>>> MP OFF: 2:28 >>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:12 >>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:26 >>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55 >>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:18 >>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12 >>>> Cineware: 8:51 >>>> Element 3D: 5:02 >>>> >>>> >>>> "The flash" >>>> 4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on >>>> >>>> MP OFF: 2:22 >>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:25 >>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:36 >>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11 >>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:22 >>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15 >>>> Cineware: 8:42 >>>> Element 3D: na >>>> >>>> >>>> "JACKAL" >>>> Late 2013 Macbook pro >>>> 2.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, gtx 720m, 1 TB >>>> on board SSD, hyperthreading on >>>> >>>> MP OFF: 2:34 >>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:36 >>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:35 >>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01 >>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:25 >>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23 >>>> Cineware: 9:13 >>>> Element 3D: na >>>> >>>> Some really interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet >>>> with some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it >>>> out! >>>> -TG >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> _____________________________ >>> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist >>> teddygage dot com >>> >>> >> > --047d7b3436d20d9f7404f6648f52 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned.<= br>
-Darby


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Byron Nash <byronnash@g= mail.com> wrote:
Yeah, something seems fishy= . I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try to put the Titan in the PC ne= xt and see how it fairs.


=
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash <= byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, I'm get= ting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll test my PC with a 680= next and see how it compares.


On Wed, Apr 2= , 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote= :
Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other t= ests on the titan? My guess is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the= motherboard, maybe the pci bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support a= ll the titan throughput? Or could be that the pc drivers are simply much mo= re optimized?

What kind of numbers do you get from this test=A0

Should be around 4-6 minutes i think

Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get arou= nd 110 - 120 FPS in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on ov= erclock


On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
I just ran the t= est on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan GPU. I only got 12mi= n on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower than your PC with t= he Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting the performance in= that GPU heavy comp?


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier o= nce I get more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.co= m or on twitter @teddyrocksteady

http://goo.gl/JrNIXd=A0

Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers= ? Should only take about 20 minutes

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint <delr= azoraelist@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Teddy,

Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the results?

Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page wit= h the submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when resea= rching new processors to see how they fair in the benchmark.

///Greg Balint
//Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/
=A0=A0=A0

On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" <<= a>teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that = your machine will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project

Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/After= BenchCC/

It's not really recommended for s= ystems older than 2 years, it may take a long time to run, especially with = older GPUs. However it is broken into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can = pick and choose which test you want to run without demanding too much time = or resources. I highly recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear = idea of system performance in a single run.=A0

Here are my current results, the rest of our machines w= ill be added soon.

"IRONMAN"
4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off

MP OFF: 2:28
4K KEYFRAME: 3:12
4K ENC= ODING H264: 0:26
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55
4K Enco= ding MP4: 0:18
RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12
Cineware: 8:51
Element 3= D: 5:02


"The flash"
=
4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on

MP OFF: 2:22
4K KEYFRAME: 3:25
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:36
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11
4K En= coding MP4: 0:22
RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15
Cineware: 8:= 42
Element 3D: na


"JACKAL&qu= ot;=A0
Late 2013 Macbook pro
=A02.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8= GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, =A0gtx 720m, 1 TB on board SSD, hyperthreadi= ng on

MP OFF: 2:34
4K KEYFRAME: 3:36
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:35
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01
4K En= coding MP4: 0:25
RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23
Cineware: 9= :13
Element 3D: na=A0

Some real= ly interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet with som= e nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it out!
-TG



--
_____________________________=
VFX & M= otion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com




--047d7b3436d20d9f7404f6648f52--