Return-Path: Received: from [210.54.141.239] (HELO fep01.xtra.co.nz) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5450413 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:43:56 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.64] (really [115.188.226.106]) by fep01.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20140422204351.NQAT26899.fep01.xtra.co.nz@[192.168.1.64]> for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:43:51 +1200 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:43:48 +1200 Subject: Re: [AE] stock photo sites From: Harriet Thompson To: After Effects Mail List Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [AE] stock photo sites Thread-Index: Ac9ea4+O09r6lh1jz06x7Jh0QGEIPQ== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3481087431_69570" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3481087431_69570 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable istock also has a feature where you can narrow down your search results to either =B3Creative=B2 or =B3Editorial=B2 (checkbox in the left-hand column. But =B3Editorial=B2 isn=B9t just a name for more realistic/documentary-style images. =B3Editorial=B2 means un-released images that can only be licensed for editoria= l purposes ie. for newspaper and magazine articles, blog posts, websites, documentaries, TV news etc. Not for commercial use. See this article for an introduction to using Editorial images: http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=3D1096 Harriet Istock contributor On 23/04/14 6:33 AM, "Jim Curtis" wrote: > Getty would be the go-to source for realistic "editorial" photos, but at > $1000+ for even a local single-run TV ad. Most of my clients are running > state races or for the US House, and are paying me about $2K/ad, and they= 're > just not going to buy off on $6-10K for stock images. Getty also has a n= ice > feature in their search engine which lets you choose between "creative" o= r > stylized (usually hokey) setups, or "editorial" realistic/documentary sty= le > images.=20 --B_3481087431_69570 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [AE] stock photo sites
istock also has a feature where you can narrow down your search results to = either “Creative” or “Editorial” (checkbox in the le= ft-hand column. But “Editorial” isn’t just a name for more= realistic/documentary-style images. “Editorial” means un-releas= ed images that can only be licensed for editorial purposes ie. for newspaper= and magazine articles, blog posts, websites, documentaries, TV news etc. No= t for commercial use. See this article for an introduction to using Editoria= l images:
http://www.is= tockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=3D1096

Harriet
Istock contributor


On 23/04/14 6:33 AM, "Jim Curtis" <j= pcurtis@me.com> wrote:
<= SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:11pt'>Getty would be the go-to source for realistic &q= uot;editorial" photos, but at $1000+ for even a local single-run TV ad.=  Most of my clients are running state races or for the US House, and a= re paying me about $2K/ad, and they're just not going to buy off on $6-10K f= or stock images.  Getty also has a nice feature in their search engine = which lets you choose between "creative" or stylized (usually hoke= y) setups, or "editorial" realistic/documentary style images.
--B_3481087431_69570--