Return-Path: Received: from nk11p00mm-asmtp005.mac.com ([17.158.161.4] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5450432 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 23:09:01 +0200 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_6jL7yNz7AJ/f8O/tHh0h9w)" Received: from [192.168.1.68] (99-152-153-100.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.153.100]) by nk11p00mm-asmtp005.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N4G000BLAQZFV50@nk11p00mm-asmtp005.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:09:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Jim Curtis Message-id: Subject: Re: [AE] stock photo sites Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:08:59 -0500 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-reply-to: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-MANTSH: 1TEIXREEbG1oaGkdHB0lGUkdDRl5PWBoaGREKTEMXGx0EGx8SBBscHwQdGRAbHho fGhEKWE0XSxEKbX4XGhEKTFkXGxobGxEKWUkXEQpZXhdoY2YRCkNOF0sbGRpiTk1mHxkcWxl4c wcZZxgbGhMabhEKWFwXGQQaBB0HTUsdEkhJHEwFGx0EGx8SBBscHwQdGRAbHhofGxEKXlkXYUB iEmIRCkxGF2JraxEKQ1oXExMEGx8YBBsfGQQbGhoRCkJGF2MYfGl4eFlIelsBEQpCRRdnehJTf BJwUx1uHhEKQk4XbHBgeUAdYlJpGmIRCkJMF2sdUhoFH0JDGEEcEQpCbBdlHHJHZ39PWmVgZhE KQkAXb25SXmRyXnJYYXMRCkJYF2lhQ25nW155XkRyEQpwZxdhRH9ZfUlQWlBuQxEKcGgXaRMdU GtYQV1AQnwRCnBoF2BeG01CcmMTW15EEQpwaBdgW2FpXHwTRBlyHhEKcGgXYFwZfwEbQRxQbAE RCnBoF25oGUcaeBt9ZWx+EQpwfxdjBQESemZdYGlyTxEKcF8XZ3t8YG1BEnhuXk4RCnBnF2ZPc kRnc3xzAUhEEQpwbBd6X31jTEdzWGJwSxEKcEwXbmRJXB5hZxNIb28R X-CLX-Spam: false X-CLX-Score: 1011 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.96,1.0.14,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-04-22_07:2014-04-22,2014-04-22,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1404220298 --Boundary_(ID_6jL7yNz7AJ/f8O/tHh0h9w) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for setting me straight, Harriet. =20 If you have the attention of anybody at iStock, I'd appreciate your = support in my campaign to have them add a filter for realistic vs. = "stylized" tableaus, and to have each image only appear once in search = results. On Apr 22, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Harriet Thompson = wrote: >=20 > istock also has a feature where you can narrow down your search = results to either =93Creative=94 or =93Editorial=94 (checkbox in the = left-hand column. But =93Editorial=94 isn=92t just a name for more = realistic/documentary-style images. =93Editorial=94 means un-released = images that can only be licensed for editorial purposes ie. for = newspaper and magazine articles, blog posts, websites, documentaries, TV = news etc. Not for commercial use. See this article for an introduction = to using Editorial images: > http://www.istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=3D1096 >=20 > Harriet > Istock contributor >=20 >=20 > On 23/04/14 6:33 AM, "Jim Curtis" wrote: > Getty would be the go-to source for realistic "editorial" photos, but = at $1000+ for even a local single-run TV ad. Most of my clients are = running state races or for the US House, and are paying me about $2K/ad, = and they're just not going to buy off on $6-10K for stock images. Getty = also has a nice feature in their search engine which lets you choose = between "creative" or stylized (usually hokey) setups, or "editorial" = realistic/documentary style images. --Boundary_(ID_6jL7yNz7AJ/f8O/tHh0h9w) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable




<= div>On Apr 22, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Harriet Thompson <harriet@synthetic.co.nz> = wrote:

Re: [AE] stock photo sites

istock also has a feature where you can narrow down your search results = to either =93Creative=94 or =93Editorial=94 (checkbox in the left-hand = column. But =93Editorial=94 isn=92t just a name for more = realistic/documentary-style images. =93Editorial=94 means un-released = images that can only be licensed for editorial purposes ie. for = newspaper and magazine articles, blog posts, websites, documentaries, TV = news etc. Not for commercial use. See this article for an introduction = to using Editorial images:
http://www.= istockphoto.com/article_view.php?ID=3D1096

Harriet
Istock contributor


On 23/04/14 6:33 AM, "Jim Curtis" <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:
Getty would be the go-to source = for realistic "editorial" photos, but at $1000+ for even a local = single-run TV ad.  Most of my clients are running state races or = for the US House, and are paying me about $2K/ad, and they're just not = going to buy off on $6-10K for stock images.  Getty also has a nice = feature in their search engine which lets you choose between "creative" = or stylized (usually hokey) setups, or "editorial" realistic/documentary = style images.

= --Boundary_(ID_6jL7yNz7AJ/f8O/tHh0h9w)--