MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hedczech@gmail.com
From: "scott.aelist" <scott.aelist@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:10:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOoNOO1XDv+Or8cvmEFUbas=LFGaJwpCoLe+GV+Z2n21-dEvtg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: render second output module as QC render: reliable?
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0437495585977c04f7ccf0de

--f46d0437495585977c04f7ccf0de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm rendering some large 4k tiff sequences in the evening and I want to
check them to make sure there aren't any errors. So I render a separate
quicktime that is viewer-friendly so that I can check them. A coworker
suggested to me that my quicktime may render fine, but that AE could write
bad TIFF frames and I'd never know it. He things to be 100% safe I should
first render my TIFF sequence, and then re-render that sequence as a
quicktime. What do people think?

--f46d0437495585977c04f7ccf0de
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I&#39;m rendering some large 4k tiff sequences in the=
 evening and I want to check them to make sure there aren&#39;t any errors.=
 So I render a separate quicktime that is viewer-friendly so that I can che=
ck them. A coworker suggested to me that my quicktime may render fine, but =
that AE could write bad TIFF frames and I&#39;d never know it. He things to=
 be 100% safe I should first render my TIFF sequence, and then re-render th=
at sequence as a quicktime. What do people think?<br>

<br></div></div>

--f46d0437495585977c04f7ccf0de--