Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com ([209.85.192.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5457716 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:04:41 +0200 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so7510021qgd.21 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ALR5ruSJa60tih5vskTgr4SjLIDtL6r9WGHscXquBAM=; b=FPeI1VF/rm5HG7gNqGjbDPrNrwRQIMaVHIiQNtF//KlCe5n3HoodnCR/kpMij3j0ac 5G/vShwviTkp/bwoPuqUj1ANXw/A5AO4T4Iz6LtfP5fRASlnF88bjUTYgQer0430pPT8 osIiqsVC7M+j2dl532X8kbBYzNr4mC65szch3iQO4ykCMiAZSZ1MYQOEsUe/fOKctJV/ gDsRKXmaAdNiZwhrd9PAv2lQp0gq2dUdbkRBGSoFAQ8CeX5z8vZHnoHohzNETGLkugdN RC9VZaDs5IBxlrc2Ob4zpDKljNrB+ahIzToabNPwgJr8mAkcEmEnGxyFr9TviU/aEHms 54Pg== X-Received: by 10.140.19.133 with SMTP id 5mr34806949qgh.46.1398719079975; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:04:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.102.201 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:04:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Byron Nash Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:04:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] AfterBenchCC - A free total After Effects benchmarking suite for CPU/GPU/RAM To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11355746e7130304f820a98c --001a11355746e7130304f820a98c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Finally had a chance to try the Titan in my PC and compare it to the Mac performance. The OpenGL is slightly slower than it was with the GTX680 on this PC with CineBench. In the GPU AfterBench render test, the titan on the PC rendered the comp in 4:50. That puts it in line with some of the results I was seeing and beats the 680 squarely. It's a shame the Titan doesn't perform as well on OSX as it does on Windows. On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: > I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned. > > -Darby > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Byron Nash wrote: > >> Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try >> to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll test my >>> PC with a 680 next and see how it compares. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>> >>>> Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other tests on the titan? My guess >>>> is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe the pci >>>> bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support all the titan throughput? Or >>>> could be that the pc drivers are simply much more optimized? >>>> >>>> What kind of numbers do you get from this test >>>> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 >>>> >>>> Should be around 4-6 minutes i think >>>> >>>> Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get around 110 - 120 FPS >>>> in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on overclock >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just ran the test on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan >>>>> GPU. I only got 12min on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower >>>>> than your PC with the Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting >>>>> the performance in that GPU heavy comp? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier once I get >>>>> more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.com or on >>>>> twitter @teddyrocksteady >>>>> >>>>> http://goo.gl/JrNIXd >>>>> >>>>> Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers? Should only >>>>> take about 20 minutes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint < >>>>> delrazoraelist@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Teddy, >>>>> >>>>> Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the >>>>> results? >>>>> >>>>> Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page with the >>>>> submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when researching new >>>>> processors to see how they fair in the benchmark. >>>>> >>>>> ///Greg Balint >>>>> //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer >>>>> /321.514.4839 >>>>> delRAZOR.com/ >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that your machine >>>>> will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project >>>>> >>>>> https://vimeo.com/90489125 >>>>> >>>>> Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/ >>>>> >>>>> It's not really recommended for systems older than 2 years, it may >>>>> take a long time to run, especially with older GPUs. However it is broken >>>>> into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can pick and choose which test you >>>>> want to run without demanding too much time or resources. I highly >>>>> recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear idea of system >>>>> performance in a single run. >>>>> >>>>> Here are my current results, the rest of our machines will be added >>>>> soon. >>>>> >>>>> "IRONMAN" >>>>> 4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off >>>>> >>>>> MP OFF: 2:28 >>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:12 >>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:26 >>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55 >>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:18 >>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12 >>>>> Cineware: 8:51 >>>>> Element 3D: 5:02 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "The flash" >>>>> 4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on >>>>> >>>>> MP OFF: 2:22 >>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:25 >>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:36 >>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11 >>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:22 >>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15 >>>>> Cineware: 8:42 >>>>> Element 3D: na >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "JACKAL" >>>>> Late 2013 Macbook pro >>>>> 2.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, gtx 720m, 1 TB >>>>> on board SSD, hyperthreading on >>>>> >>>>> MP OFF: 2:34 >>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:36 >>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:35 >>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01 >>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:25 >>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23 >>>>> Cineware: 9:13 >>>>> Element 3D: na >>>>> >>>>> Some really interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a >>>>> spreadsheet with some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for >>>>> checking it out! >>>>> -TG >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> _____________________________ >>>> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist >>>> teddygage dot com >>>> >>>> >>> >> > --001a11355746e7130304f820a98c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Finally had a chance to try the Titan in my PC and compare= it to the Mac performance. The OpenGL is slightly slower than it was with = the GTX680 on this PC with CineBench. In the GPU AfterBench render test, th= e titan on the PC rendered the comp in 4:50. That puts it in line with some= of the results I was seeing and beats the 680 squarely. It's a shame t= he Titan doesn't perform as well on OSX as it does on Windows.=C2=A0


On Sun, Apr 6= , 2014 at 3:14 PM, Darby Edelen <dedelen@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned.<= span class=3D"HOEnZb">

<= span class=3D"HOEnZb">-Darby


On Wed, Apr 2, 20= 14 at 9:24 AM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I m= ay try to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs.


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash= <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the = CPU. I'll test my PC with a 680 next and see how it compares.


<= div>
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <teddy= gage@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmmm inte= resting... Have you run any other tests on the titan? My guess is that ther= e is some kind of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe the pci bandwidth of= the older mac pro doesnt support all the titan throughput? Or could be tha= t the pc drivers are simply much more optimized?

What kind of numbers do you get from this test=C2=A0
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120

Should be around 4-6 minutes i think

Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get arou= nd 110 - 120 FPS in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on ov= erclock


On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
I just ran the t= est on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan GPU. I only got 12mi= n on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower than your PC with t= he Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting the performance in= that GPU heavy comp?


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier o= nce I get more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.co= m or on twitter @teddyrocksteady

http://goo.gl/JrNIXd=C2=A0

Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers= ? Should only take about 20 minutes

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint <delr= azoraelist@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Teddy,

Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the results?

Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page wit= h the submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when resea= rching new processors to see how they fair in the benchmark.

///Greg Balint
//Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0

On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" <<= a>teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that = your machine will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project

Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/After= BenchCC/

It's not really recommended for s= ystems older than 2 years, it may take a long time to run, especially with = older GPUs. However it is broken into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can = pick and choose which test you want to run without demanding too much time = or resources. I highly recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear = idea of system performance in a single run.=C2=A0

Here are my current results, the rest of our machines w= ill be added soon.

"IRONMAN"
4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off

MP OFF: 2:28
4K KEYFRAME: 3:12
4K ENC= ODING H264: 0:26
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55
4K Enco= ding MP4: 0:18
RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12
Cineware: 8:51
Element 3= D: 5:02


"The flash"
=
4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on

MP OFF: 2:22
4K KEYFRAME: 3:25
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:36
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11
4K En= coding MP4: 0:22
RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15
Cineware: 8:= 42
Element 3D: na


"JACKAL&qu= ot;=C2=A0
Late 2013 Macbook pro
=C2=A02.6 GHZ boost up = to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, =C2=A0gtx 720m, 1 TB on board SSD, hyp= erthreading on

MP OFF: 2:34
4K KEYFRAME: 3:36
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:35
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01
4K En= coding MP4: 0:25
RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23
Cineware: 9= :13
Element 3D: na=C2=A0

Some r= eally interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet with = some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it out!
-TG



--
_____________________________=
VFX & M= otion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com





--001a11355746e7130304f820a98c--