Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5458711 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:31:39 +0200 Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q200so540348ykb.34 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=9KXAYav7N15eekcViHlHmdyMJyYsvSJV1u30ibxEOTQ=; b=uzRV/tmdoic1olyUdXusmVOR5bjh5ECYtQJRFyRgN7FJtqlv7OeipIiiJ0xCQMDaUx 9+vdBR9hNAGCOtsC2soIsefbhyb5GDupUcWi1lTK4ZqgoxPBxxOy9/b0SMhIMf5WfxIV Kx4DoOlgBG3hwKfuo6Hl4sWQVEXkIgAsja3e59vvFs7d11g31dW8RZGRB/VoLOXFGC4A YNLUZ4PKxohjqnIDYmk1LxhaiP7ARZf39ezJrczePTmtIyQ1/QFjbxocPFKJ6TV+tzya P43pLXKpJB6SZGB+YTq5WQsshLWz28TxoCIMR2HDfIRORZMd3CjxaOZ9Xgquy72PmXR7 tCYg== X-Received: by 10.236.41.165 with SMTP id h25mr5379425yhb.126.1398796297218; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:31:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.76.134 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:30:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:30:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] AfterBenchCC - A free total After Effects benchmarking suite for CPU/GPU/RAM To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a011668b08604f832a4f8 --089e013a011668b08604f832a4f8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Awesome, would love to see your specific results. Still would love to see someone run at least a few of these benches on a new mac pro. All results welcome of course -TG On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Byron Nash wrote: > Finally had a chance to try the Titan in my PC and compare it to the Mac > performance. The OpenGL is slightly slower than it was with the GTX680 on > this PC with CineBench. In the GPU AfterBench render test, the titan on the > PC rendered the comp in 4:50. That puts it in line with some of the results > I was seeing and beats the 680 squarely. It's a shame the Titan doesn't > perform as well on OSX as it does on Windows. > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: > >> I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned. >> >> -Darby >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Byron Nash wrote: >> >>> Yeah, something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try >>> to put the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll test my >>>> PC with a 680 next and see how it compares. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hmmm interesting... Have you run any other tests on the titan? My >>>>> guess is that there is some kind of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe >>>>> the pci bandwidth of the older mac pro doesnt support all the titan >>>>> throughput? Or could be that the pc drivers are simply much more optimized? >>>>> >>>>> What kind of numbers do you get from this test >>>>> http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120 >>>>> >>>>> Should be around 4-6 minutes i think >>>>> >>>>> Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get around 110 - 120 >>>>> FPS in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on overclock >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I just ran the test on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a >>>>>> Titan GPU. I only got 12min on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much >>>>>> slower than your PC with the Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is >>>>>> affecting the performance in that GPU heavy comp? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier once I get >>>>>> more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.com or >>>>>> on twitter @teddyrocksteady >>>>>> >>>>>> http://goo.gl/JrNIXd >>>>>> >>>>>> Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers? Should only >>>>>> take about 20 minutes >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint < >>>>>> delrazoraelist@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey Teddy, >>>>>> >>>>>> Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the >>>>>> results? >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page with the >>>>>> submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when researching new >>>>>> processors to see how they fair in the benchmark. >>>>>> >>>>>> ///Greg Balint >>>>>> //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer >>>>>> /321.514.4839 >>>>>> delRAZOR.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that your >>>>>> machine will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project >>>>>> >>>>>> https://vimeo.com/90489125 >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/AfterBenchCC/ >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not really recommended for systems older than 2 years, it may >>>>>> take a long time to run, especially with older GPUs. However it is broken >>>>>> into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can pick and choose which test you >>>>>> want to run without demanding too much time or resources. I highly >>>>>> recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear idea of system >>>>>> performance in a single run. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are my current results, the rest of our machines will be added >>>>>> soon. >>>>>> >>>>>> "IRONMAN" >>>>>> 4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off >>>>>> >>>>>> MP OFF: 2:28 >>>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:12 >>>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:26 >>>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55 >>>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:18 >>>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12 >>>>>> Cineware: 8:51 >>>>>> Element 3D: 5:02 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "The flash" >>>>>> 4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on >>>>>> >>>>>> MP OFF: 2:22 >>>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:25 >>>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:36 >>>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11 >>>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:22 >>>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15 >>>>>> Cineware: 8:42 >>>>>> Element 3D: na >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "JACKAL" >>>>>> Late 2013 Macbook pro >>>>>> 2.6 GHZ boost up to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, gtx 720m, 1 >>>>>> TB on board SSD, hyperthreading on >>>>>> >>>>>> MP OFF: 2:34 >>>>>> 4K KEYFRAME: 3:36 >>>>>> 4K ENCODING H264: 0:35 >>>>>> Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01 >>>>>> 4K Encoding MP4: 0:25 >>>>>> RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23 >>>>>> Cineware: 9:13 >>>>>> Element 3D: na >>>>>> >>>>>> Some really interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a >>>>>> spreadsheet with some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for >>>>>> checking it out! >>>>>> -TG >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> _____________________________ >>>>> VFX & Motion Graphic Artist >>>>> teddygage dot com >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- _____________________________ VFX & Motion Graphic Artist teddygage dot com --089e013a011668b08604f832a4f8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Awesome, would love to see your specific results.

=
Still would love to see someone run at least a few of these benc= hes on a new mac pro. All results welcome of course
-TG


On Mon, Apr 2= 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote= :
Finally had a chance to try the Titan in my PC and compare= it to the Mac performance. The OpenGL is slightly slower than it was with = the GTX680 on this PC with CineBench. In the GPU AfterBench render test, th= e titan on the PC rendered the comp in 4:50. That puts it in line with some= of the results I was seeing and beats the 680 squarely. It's a shame t= he Titan doesn't perform as well on OSX as it does on Windows.=C2=A0


On Sun, Apr 6= , 2014 at 3:14 PM, Darby Edelen <dedelen@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd wager that the Mac drivers are not as tuned.<= span>

-Darby


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:24 AM= , Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah,= something seems fishy. I got 88fps with the 680 on a PC. I may try to put = the Titan in the PC next and see how it fairs.


On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Byron Nash <byronnas= h@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, I'm getting 45fps in Cinebench. 1288cb for the CPU. I'll= test my PC with a 680 next and see how it compares.


<= div>
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Teddy Gage <= teddygage@gmail.co= m> wrote:
Hmmm interesting... Ha= ve you run any other tests on the titan? My guess is that there is some kin= d of bottleneck on the motherboard, maybe the pci bandwidth of the older ma= c pro doesnt support all the titan throughput? Or could be that the pc driv= ers are simply much more optimized?

What kind of numbers do you get from this test=C2=A0
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/2/1019120

Should be around 4-6 minutes i think

Or from cinebench r15 in the openGL portion? I get arou= nd 110 - 120 FPS in the openGL test on that with the titan, depending on ov= erclock


On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Byron Nash <byronnash@gmail.com> wrote:
I just ran the t= est on a MacPro(5,1) 12 core with 16GB RAM and a Titan GPU. I only got 12mi= n on the GPU test. I wonder why it's so much slower than your PC with t= he Titan? Do you think the CPU speed or RAM is affecting the performance in= that GPU heavy comp?


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg, here are the results so far, will make it prettier o= nce I get more info. Please send me your scores to fstopdigital@gmail.co= m or on twitter @teddyrocksteady

http://goo.gl/JrNIXd=C2=A0

Would love to see this run on a new mac pro, any takers= ? Should only take about 20 minutes

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Greg Balint <delr= azoraelist@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey Teddy,

Any way you could do something similar to cbscores.com with the results?

Maybe ask the 3d Fluff guys for a template of their page wit= h the submit functionality and such. It's been a great go-to when resea= rching new processors to see how they fair in the benchmark.

///Greg Balint
//Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0

On Mar 31, 2014 11:46 AM, "Teddy Gage" <<= a>teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
New update - Here is a sample video of all the files that = your machine will render in a run of the 60 MB AfterBenchCC project

Again, the file is available at www.teddygage.com/After= BenchCC/

It's not really recommended for s= ystems older than 2 years, it may take a long time to run, especially with = older GPUs. However it is broken into several 3-5 minute tests, so you can = pick and choose which test you want to run without demanding too much time = or resources. I highly recommend the fractal noise CPU test to get a clear = idea of system performance in a single run.=C2=A0

Here are my current results, the rest of our machines w= ill be added soon.

"IRONMAN"
4.7 GHz hex core CPU, 64 GB RAM, 720 GB SSD RAID1, hyperthreading off

MP OFF: 2:28
4K KEYFRAME: 3:12
4K ENC= ODING H264: 0:26
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 3:55
4K Enco= ding MP4: 0:18
RT & EnvMap GPU: 5:12
Cineware: 8:51
Element 3= D: 5:02


"The flash"
=
4.3 GHZ quad cpu, 4770k, 16gb ram, 2x gtx 580, hyperthreading on

MP OFF: 2:22
4K KEYFRAME: 3:25
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:36
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:11
4K En= coding MP4: 0:22
RT & EnvMap GPU: 4:15
Cineware: 8:= 42
Element 3D: na


"JACKAL&qu= ot;=C2=A0
Late 2013 Macbook pro
=C2=A02.6 GHZ boost up = to 3.8 GHz, quad core cpu, 16gb ram, =C2=A0gtx 720m, 1 TB on board SSD, hyp= erthreading on

MP OFF: 2:34
4K KEYFRAME: 3:36
4K E= NCODING H264: 0:35
Fractal Noise 4K all CPU: 7:01
4K En= coding MP4: 0:25
RT & EnvMap GPU: 43:23
Cineware: 9= :13
Element 3D: na=C2=A0

Some r= eally interesting numbers here, I'm going to create a spreadsheet with = some nice graphs and have a link on my site. Thanks for checking it out!
-TG



=
--
_____________________________=
VFX & M= otion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com

<= font color=3D"#888888">






--
_____________________________
<= font style=3D"background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" color=3D"#6aa84f" size=3D"= 1" face=3D"georgia, serif">VFX & Motion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com
--089e013a011668b08604f832a4f8--