| ||||||||||
|
Hi Stephen,
That matches my own experience, thanks for providing this information
verifying what is generally the most stable.
Cheers
Anders
From: Stephen van Vuuren
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: [AE] Rendering Direct to QuickTime MOV vs rendering out
to image sequence first & RAM vs Render to file AE
renders as opposed to RAM previews often need help of a component or
intermediary. I recently found out the QuickTime server for renders is 32-bit,
not 64-bit and I’ve found QuickTime renders the most unstable of a couple of my
boxes. Image sequence renders are usually direct from AE depending on format and
the most stable. stephen
van vuuren 336.202.4777 http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ A
film is – or should be – more like music than like fiction. It should be a
progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what’s behind the emotion, the
meaning, all that comes later. –Stanley
Kubrick From: After Effects Mail
List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Anders
Sundstedt Hi, How come when
rendering a project directly to QuickTime .MOV it can often fail/stop during
render, while if first rendering out to an image sequence (TGA) and then
rendering that to QuickTime .MOV it usually works? Same with RAM preview
vs image sequence rendering. How come it often works fine to do a RAM preview at
100% quality while when rendering out the same sequence to image files it can
often fail at a certain frame/frames that worked fine in RAM
preview? Thanks Anders
Sundstedt |
