Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5473395 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 14 May 2014 22:04:52 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id lf12so3192078vcb.1 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 13:04:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=R+ZG6iEsc5d3eFLmHf8bXmFS+bFRgoN54PF+EsnaTHs=; b=fihXfnz4892t8m1q/gNhpMuPNtU7bEo/Q0hs6BN+OiH/BzotOeg6H4HkW76De9zLd7 7UQyApG8h4HCaNBNzyuelKlVEzJwicIE2FzsBo3eeLJqYKsDf/MBijD9v/pqHcJnlO2o etZmC9ywFtpAKc0marD5tVVrXQKQQX3L1L1yGQd1AO8QMWGwwusk1qxYpFn48ed55mWI blSF9HoI8hQRD+GgN52Dxnbhxr9BCIJALaddTDmo4c1fcB5mRF+oyA6vn+AegZjSS1eb oq01eSSaIRhJdnry3p/mKatgk//tYm9IjxdPupFNJIApVvRhRfceD+lK3UhfJImqhP+Q q4Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUqfNNwbS7UqSjYTXCGgQuMvwFy0lxr86rkEVz6S4N2LIIgwtOdQ7NFQjcir31sMi10T/X X-Received: by 10.52.12.36 with SMTP id v4mr3881960vdb.20.1400097890748; Wed, 14 May 2014 13:04:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.84.167 with HTTP; Wed, 14 May 2014 13:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Robert Kjettrup Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 22:04:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] UHD on Mac To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dd2996de0b404f961b172 --485b397dd2996de0b404f961b172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 After i googled for that Samsund i looked around what Dell had. Well, they have that ~us$3000 28" UHD that i think you referenced in the first post, but also a 24" that is much more reasonable priced, a bit pricer than the TN panel Samsung, but its IPS and 100% sRGB, so looks very nice, its ofcourse smaller so the pixels will be very tiny. With Lightroom being dpi scale aware on windows (and hopefully the rest of Adobe apps in the not too far future) it might be something i will consider for my lightroom editing at home, the photos will look amazingly sharp. The price is about the price i gave for my current 10year old 4:3 1600x1200 LCD i have at home, even less taking inflation into account, so not that bad. http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=bsd&cs=04&sku=860-BBCD Maybe another option for some to consider, well maybe not for AE, those pixeltight texts in the UI will get small :-D But Scott, please keep us posted on what your experience after some longer use are on the Samsung Robert 2014-05-14 17:36 GMT+02:00 Scott Carmichael : > Robert, I will be the first to say it isn't a reference monitor but any > means. When I do some more advanced calibration I will report back. I can > say that it is a fairly decent display though just by sight calibration. > I'm just impressed that it is the first UHD display that does true 60Hz in > that price range and isn't junk! :) Even more impressed my lowly tower mac > pro will drive it at 60Hz. > > After using it has a desktop monitor, I would not want a UHD display that > is any smaller. The type is pretty small, but nice to have that much > real-estate! > > Scott > > On May 13, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Robert Kjettrup wrote: > > hmmm... just did a google on this model, and it says its a TN panel and > not IPS, so i would definately not recommend it for anything colorwise. > > > http://www.samsung.com/levant/consumer/computers-peripherals/monitors/led-monitor/LU28D590DS/ZN > > But nice to see UHD monitors getting down in price, but it will take a > little while longer to get IPS or similar quality UHD panels down in price. > > > Robert > > > --485b397dd2996de0b404f961b172 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After i googled for that Samsun= d i looked around what Dell had.=C2=A0
Well= , they have that ~us$3000 28" UHD that i think you referenced in the f= irst post, but also a 24" that is much more reasonable priced, a bit p= ricer than the TN panel Samsung, but its IPS and 100% sRGB, so looks very n= ice, its ofcourse smaller so the pixels will be very tiny.

With Lightr= oom being dpi scale aware on windows (and hopefully the rest of Adobe apps = in the not too far future) it might be something i will consider for my lig= htroom editing at home, the photos will look amazingly sharp. The price is = about the price i gave for my current 10year old 4:3 1600x1200 LCD i have a= t home, even less taking inflation into account, so not that bad.=C2=A0


Maybe= another option for some to consider, well maybe not for AE, those pixeltig= ht texts in the UI will get small :-D

<= /div>
But Scott, please keep us posted on what your ex= perience after some longer use are on the Samsung

Robert



201= 4-05-14 17:36 GMT+02:00 Scott Carmichael <sacarmic@indiana.edu><= /span>:
Robert, I will be the = first to say it isn't a reference monitor but any means. =C2=A0When I d= o some more advanced calibration I will report back. =C2=A0I can say that i= t is a fairly decent display though just by sight calibration. =C2=A0I'= m just impressed that it is the first UHD display that does true 60Hz in th= at price range and isn't junk! :) =C2=A0Even more impressed my lowly to= wer mac pro will drive it at 60Hz.

After using it has a desktop monitor, I would not want a UHD= display that is any smaller. =C2=A0The type is pretty small, but nice to h= ave that much real-estate!=C2=A0

Scott
On May 13, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Robert Kjettrup <robert@maydayfilm.dk> wrote:

hmmm... just did a google on this model, and it says its a TN panel and not= IPS, so i would definately not recommend it for anything colorwise.

But nice to see UHD monitors getting down in price, but= it will take a little while longer to get IPS or similar quality UHD panel= s down in price.


Robert=C2=A0


=

--485b397dd2996de0b404f961b172--