Return-Path: Received: from mail-yh0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5475405 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 17 May 2014 00:38:39 +0200 Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f73so4945048yha.10 for ; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; bh=lLrki+IGRzIiek735xfUXR5YGP/rzeh66a7sWNtsktM=; b=FhAHoz8d81Oa/ZxJ9odUJm7cme/B8Exo3xueKXvPR7klmsP88gJy/5Y7/t10a6QaSW 7MWFfUYyyn4OHlGHF38UL2GBQThH13HL3xI0agAdZ/IqH/J4joOs7tUnlO/I5/fdCBC4 yMoQwTTr+f9d/XAR7v2yvxNOOjUnmpCJOUoIzXtkAxeJePl+EUFBrKfkLh+eAnBUwVgs j/gZb8i+XpkB6VOVun2XQ2k6kGDNQ4MXiNfwt5rPaPH5ShbVsb7El2YzeteovvSKlOFV 5ENP9tV9LswFEzhpBue9uGnLWDWGOIoemlsm+Ve9Voe7731VFD7HpE7//Kxlzfk4/gz0 y++g== X-Received: by 10.236.30.105 with SMTP id j69mr6747269yha.19.1400279917957; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.1.6] (c-68-60-7-197.hsd1.tn.comcast.net. [68.60.7.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z63sm13890873yhl.15.2014.05.16.15.38.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 May 2014 15:38:36 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-35C774DB-5348-431E-8337-C0AE9628A440 Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350) From: Philip Luckey Subject: Re: [AE] Lossless movie format Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:38:36 -0400 To: After Effects Mail List --Apple-Mail-35C774DB-5348-431E-8337-C0AE9628A440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I like MoX: Movie (or MXF) Open eXchange. If only because it's similar to m= oxie: which refers to "taking the initiative". Not to mention .mox is an upd= ate from .mov Sent from my iPhone On May 16, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > just spitballing, most of these are probably already in use: >=20 > - .ofx - open visual effects > - .fex - Effects exchange > - .oav - open audio / video=20 > - .ogr - open graphics exchange > - .cgr - creative graphics format > - .mox - movie open exchange=20 > - .pox - professional open exchange > - .bmx - cool bike, man >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Brendan Bolles w= rote: >> On May 13, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Steve Oakley wrote: >>=20 >> > UMF pronounced as in have you got any umph ? :) .... also know as Univ= ersal Media Format >> > >> > UNC Universal New Codec >>=20 >>=20 >> More thoughts on naming....there are already things called POM, including= a file format used by a Java development system (pom.xml). Wikipedia has a= whole list: >>=20 >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pom >>=20 >> It would be nice to have a name that was unique, like OpenEXR is. Other n= ames that popped into my head early on include OpenMovie and OpenMOV, maybe u= sing the .omv extension. UMF isn't bad. Obviously POM is what I'm still fa= voring. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> It was also pointed out to me that what I'm proposing to do is similar to= these MXF "Application Specifications": >>=20 >> http://www.amwa.tv/projects/application_specifications.shtml >>=20 >> The current ones do not meet our needs, but I should probably add "MXF fo= r Visual Effects" or something. I think re-branding the format is still a g= ood idea though, as "AS-13 MXF" isn't too sexy. >>=20 >>=20 >> Brendan >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > _____________________________ > VFX & Motion Graphic Artist > teddygage dot com --Apple-Mail-35C774DB-5348-431E-8337-C0AE9628A440 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I like MoX:  Movie (or MXF) Open eXchange. If only because it's similar to moxie: which refers to "taking the initiative". Not to mention .mox is an update from .mov



Sent from my iPhone

On May 16, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:

just spitballing, most of these are probably already in use:

- .ofx - open visual effects
- .fex - Effects exchange
- .oav - open audio / video 
- .ogr - open graphics exchange
- .cgr - creative graphics format
- .mox - movie open exchange 
- .pox - professional open exchange
- .bmx - cool bike, man



On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Brendan Bolles <brendan@fnordware.com> wrote:
On May 13, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Steve Oakley wrote:

> UMF pronounced as in have you got any  umph ? :) .... also know as Universal Media Format
>
> UNC Universal New Codec


More thoughts on naming....there are already things called POM, including a file format used by a Java development system (pom.xml).  Wikipedia has a whole list:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pom

It would be nice to have a name that was unique, like OpenEXR is.  Other names that popped into my head early on include OpenMovie and OpenMOV, maybe using the .omv extension.  UMF isn't bad.  Obviously POM is what I'm still favoring.



It was also pointed out to me that what I'm proposing to do is similar to these MXF "Application Specifications":

http://www.amwa.tv/projects/application_specifications.shtml

The current ones do not meet our needs, but I should probably add "MXF for Visual Effects" or something.  I think re-branding the format is still a good idea though, as "AS-13 MXF" isn't too sexy.


Brendan


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--
_____________________________
VFX & Motion Graphic Artist
teddygage dot com
--Apple-Mail-35C774DB-5348-431E-8337-C0AE9628A440--