Return-Path: Received: from [207.46.163.141] (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5479310 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 19 May 2014 23:48:18 +0200 Received: from BY2PR02MB316.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.140.156) by BY2PR02MB316.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.141.140.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.944.11; Mon, 19 May 2014 21:48:15 +0000 Received: from BY2PR02MB316.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.140.156]) by BY2PR02MB316.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.140.156]) with mapi id 15.00.0944.000; Mon, 19 May 2014 21:48:15 +0000 From: Todd Kopriva To: After Effects Mail List Subject: RE: [AE] CC subscription price increase Thread-Topic: [AE] CC subscription price increase Thread-Index: AQHPc6hc31JZlA5DDkSQbjGNxHkqD5tIbRdg Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 21:48:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.150.22.5] x-forefront-prvs: 021670B4D2 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(428001)(189002)(199002)(101416001)(76576001)(92566001)(74316001)(50986999)(54356999)(74502001)(83072002)(74662001)(31966008)(76176999)(77096999)(99396002)(85852003)(99286001)(80022001)(2656002)(21056001)(87936001)(66066001)(76482001)(33646001)(83322001)(81542001)(81342001)(46102001)(64706001)(77982001)(86362001)(20776003)(4396001)(79102001)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR02MB316;H:BY2PR02MB316.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; received-spf: None (: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kopriva@adobe.com; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com > Does it mean > that Adobe gets to focus more on keeping existing users happy, or does it > mean that Adobe can sit back and get lazy because we keep paying them > even if they don't add anything we want? Our attitude is that we now have to work even harder to keep existing custo= mers satisfied, because you can stop paying us at any moment (well, any mon= th, that is). Under the old model, once we got your couple thousand dollars= for a suite, you didn't have such a recourse. As After Effects product owner (the person who prioritizes what we work on)= for the past year, my focus has been on removing as many pain points as po= ssible for existing users, since that is how we get you to keep paying us. = This is in contrast to trying to come up with big flashy things that will a= ttract new users... which often don't help y'all, the existing users. As a _huge_ example in this area, consider that we have the majority of our= team doing nothing but work on performance improvements for a large fracti= on of this year. So, at least in After Effects land, the new model is better for you existin= g users. I'm not addressing matters of price here, since that is way out of my realm= ... except to say that we've noticed that the ability to get started using = the application(s) without a large initial expenditure does help a lot of f= olks.=20