From: "Rendernyc" Received: from mail-qc0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5483043 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 23 May 2014 04:45:57 +0200 Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i17so7098022qcy.36 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9+D7auG6qWsDiowKofxG46K8X16r1euwMMOScm1Vxi0=; b=G3NESGBzARxTpq3Fmyrb3iLZpvINmirQYmBxr8WZyrGwUthFngNq0jCFafSF3ZQ80H ggLeMIL35emEPbaIfByH7a6TBnMDkodATcZnGUKb6lo0lh1Qfa6/tRNEYvc5wNgGi62p 9sgnGAm+kDD9Vu7tAk9xltgwZvA2e1KsO68kpC23APckab/MwjJ9aDy8CVZee/Z9MyjC t1/ZuFBXUWa5Gi4Uu6I+jp+14ysJ6OaakO6y3JNninpfc/b3emWBr9Si2YtHuxkDjUBt 5X3WkXRXBkSXiwkHNdZ5r/UT2h89L9h+JvnpiuQLln2Y5LsMnAGibTnEaybRSQjfP4nx LTBQ== X-Received: by 10.224.71.145 with SMTP id h17mr2503835qaj.74.1400813156023; Thu, 22 May 2014 19:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1001:b026:1a8:cccf:d652:6cc:44b7? ([2600:1001:b026:1a8:cccf:d652:6cc:44b7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g74sm1110610qge.26.2014.05.22.19.45.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 May 2014 19:45:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Rendernyc Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3AB57C21-7222-4B91-A4FA-0D6A44A4FD45 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [AE] Quickest way to move a new layer to another object's position in 3D space? Message-Id: <6B0D3904-92A1-444E-9E3A-C7F6753075FC@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 22:45:54 -0400 References: In-Reply-To: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D167) --Apple-Mail-3AB57C21-7222-4B91-A4FA-0D6A44A4FD45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes it has snapping. But this is much faster if you just want to take one th= jng and send it to another layer inheriting it's position rotation and scale= .=20 > On May 22, 2014, at 10:23 PM, "scott.aelist" wro= te: >=20 > I'm not on CC right now, but doesn't it HAVE snapping? >=20 >=20 >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Rendernyc wrot= e: >> That's the answer for some things. But many times you want to snap an ite= m to another as a starting point. Not to replace it. >>=20 >> Shift parent is very easy, fast, and works in most situations. >>=20 >> > On May 22, 2014, at 9:49 PM, "scott.aelist" w= rote: >> > >> > I think the real answer is that AE should let you drag-replace anything= regardless of whether is has a 'source' or not. >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 --Apple-Mail-3AB57C21-7222-4B91-A4FA-0D6A44A4FD45 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Yes it has snapping. But this is much faster if you just want to take one thjng and send it to another layer inheriting it's position rotation and scale.

On May 22, 2014, at 10:23 PM, "scott.aelist" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

I'm not on CC right now, but doesn't it HAVE snapping?

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Rendernyc <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

That's the answer for some things. But many times you want to snap an item to another as a starting point. Not to replace it.

Shift parent is very easy, fast, and works in most situations.

> On May 22, 2014, at 9:49 PM, "scott.aelist" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
>
> I think the real answer is that AE should let you drag-replace anything regardless of whether is has a 'source' or not.

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--Apple-Mail-3AB57C21-7222-4B91-A4FA-0D6A44A4FD45--