From: "Tim Sassoon" Received: from omr-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.202] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5498760 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:21:13 +0200 Received: from mtaout-aaf01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-aaf01.mx.aol.com [172.26.127.97]) by omr-d05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 6D0D970007CD3 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:21:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tarawa.home (pool-173-51-29-245.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [173.51.29.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-aaf01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id A007F38000092; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:21:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B8D2D31B-04C4-40D9-8720-55D74E4385B9" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Lossless movie format In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:21:09 -0700 Cc: Timothy Sassoon Message-Id: References: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1402438872; bh=9yeSZxP44fNlQYmJX7p1UIGam9UZf3h0obSDZIJ7lnw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=crTZDjlUgj4Nsbu07eUP4k33GZ5gMm+KZXOSjPsx5VnOSxv+lNtUietgM4DAdjwq3 dFt73DBNSODNne5zQeum50M8lr/YL8Tml8EqDCEXUWQT7iIEdNUcPbOaTLuCUv9HCA um3oH6Ki0PDnG7tC6o77ft56F9Joz0ioUljyKDw4= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1a7f61539784d724b4 X-AOL-IP: 173.51.29.245 --Apple-Mail=_B8D2D31B-04C4-40D9-8720-55D74E4385B9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii File system limitations - serious slowdowns with many thousands of files = in the same directory. Especially a problem on Mac. Plus the ghost file = issue when going to Win from Mac. OTOH, isn't Apple going to refresh = HFS+J? Tim Sassoon SFD Venice, CA On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Brendan Bolles = wrote: > On Jun 9, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: >=20 >> We've suffered long enough under piles of 16-bit TIFF image sequences = - bring us MOX!!! >=20 >=20 > OK, so here's my follow-up question: what advantages are there to = having a movie format with these capabilities if you can already use = image sequences to get the same result? >=20 > Is it a personal preference, or are there significant workflow issues? >=20 >=20 > Brendan >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to --Apple-Mail=_B8D2D31B-04C4-40D9-8720-55D74E4385B9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii File system limitations - serious slowdowns with many thousands of files in the same directory. Especially a problem on Mac. Plus the ghost file issue when going to Win from Mac. OTOH, isn't Apple going to refresh HFS+J?

Tim Sassoon

SFD

Venice, CA

On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Brendan Bolles <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

On Jun 9, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote:

We've suffered long enough under piles of 16-bit TIFF image sequences - bring us MOX!!!

OK, so here's my follow-up question: what advantages are there to having a movie format with these capabilities if you can already use image sequences to get the same result?

Is it a personal preference, or are there significant workflow issues?

Brendan

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--Apple-Mail=_B8D2D31B-04C4-40D9-8720-55D74E4385B9--