From: "Mike Abbott" Received: from mail4-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk ([95.142.156.14] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5498774 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:40:41 +0200 Received: from [82.69.32.195] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail4-a.eqx.gridhost.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WuUh9-0004S7-IZ for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:39:08 +0100 Message-ID: <53978908.4000800@vantagegraphics.co.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:39:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] Lossless movie format References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gridhost-Auth2: mda@vantagegraphics.co.uk X-Gridhost-Auth: mda@vantagegraphics.co.uk On 10/06/2014 23:07, Brendan Bolles wrote: > OK, so here's my follow-up question: what advantages are there to > having a movie format with these capabilities if you can already use > image sequences to get the same result? It's a significant advantage if you ever forgot to move your output destination from 'desktop'... : ) Mike A.