From: "Carey Dissmore" Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5514474 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 18:56:41 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id tr6so5544053ieb.38 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=wLV93Ddse4G05Sx5D09PgOWWl9w81hOn4GMFzw+44h4=; b=OD9T1x1EF5+WTLtpRiMawmpahp5CQKduCztlev703y0bcpnQ0LhOORpzEDoHD27SEr lui6OVNUdE4QnAm8ry3HtuU4GQw3HNEh7Y0kIqSl+xUXj+ZBI6194Uy7ibZKG/ucz/Mk 1k7dIhTydhMyOI52SdFAT0X3s7qF+mm8JZ3obCuTG/5CQHwWSfAwokGHs9ehrTj2O/8r 5vEvVgJ5KTehtL/AQlSbkjM0HkJc7HLGXA2HQDclwRRg9uT+hYMwyOFaxVVcdfxzEeId 0PIvrq/hlV5+G+WpHMHuC65OozsErpF9eWylcqBZKA59H7DVARL8itlencCuUBQEy1AN IfkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxS13gFkvwsR2gagRRDweIlmRN/KmkiDddzYiDfdKRkh/CzJJ5sCUc0ReKY349kQKDQJ4f X-Received: by 10.50.114.197 with SMTP id ji5mr20691975igb.48.1403974600325; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c-24-118-184-204.hsd1.mn.comcast.net. [24.118.184.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm1226831ige.2.2014.06.28.09.56.38 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Jun 2014 09:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_974E772F-0B26-4592-A211-67FDEF9B00AC" Message-Id: <5E125544-B9A3-433C-8CCD-6F0FD07DA3D6@imugonline.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Depreciated output formats gone completely in AE 2014 Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:56:37 -0500 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) --Apple-Mail=_974E772F-0B26-4592-A211-67FDEF9B00AC Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 As far as same speeds, yes, if multiprocessing settings et al match. It probably won=92t be exact, but should be quite close. Carey On Jun 28, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Greg Balint = wrote: > Yep. That's probably my problem. I've got a 6core i7 980 with 24 gihs = of ram right now. >=20 > It should, however, be able to render at the same speeds with AE = closed, right? I'll test. >=20 > ///Greg Balint >=20 --Apple-Mail=_974E772F-0B26-4592-A211-67FDEF9B00AC Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 As far = as same speeds, yes, if multiprocessing settings et al = match.

It probably won=92t be exact, but should be = quite close.

Carey

On = Jun 28, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Greg Balint <AE-List@media-motion.tv> = wrote:

Yep. = That's probably my problem. I've got a 6core i7 980 with 24 gihs of ram = right now.

It = should, however, be able to render at the same speeds with AE closed, = right?  I'll test.

///Greg = Balint


= --Apple-Mail=_974E772F-0B26-4592-A211-67FDEF9B00AC--