From: "Steve Oakley" Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.195] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5518641 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sun, 06 Jul 2014 04:29:04 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.6] (cpe-174-103-227-20.new.res.rr.com [174.103.227.20]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MX2ZI-1X97xB1Aou-00Vuor; Sat, 05 Jul 2014 22:29:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [AE] AE on a laptop vs. iMac In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:29:00 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <219D0B9C-965B-48AF-82DA-1ED6B7D80C2E@practicalillusions.com> References: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:LkOM2L2u98r74l03yNHC81SfhWGTMfCaVicIBQe7GbO aEn6+MSYJJEyEcbp1uDiSsjNsHrDQBZZ55qM2l7BJ1k5MwtnzE gNlXN4VbPyzmZaqJpO4S8RSJBw9pYd/TjYMAKaNAznZ12QtNic /TorqOYq7J3a2LG6IUN+looW3Gf8X1Z8PC8GpCG8cjPxrl0zfd znJ+TGCANC40Vjf4dsPx3jXl11OlK/LN9KdZSubOZM4Hsa1iHI JukNDwenttyY/K0kDun4Yvdva0/f7BLfq0P5e8MIr+xcSUmVKo hshIa7Jd5hEq3VT+J9H35fdY5U2nl3FyfWTYMwA/jh7FNTwkDf QMFXcZwP4tLEbwr3YBmMDFluqmzSLavz0bThisXx28zuZ4eCMM 6v57xZ4cokM05du/iJ+ER1l2EaS2MhnHuE= i7 is big performance gain over 2 core since its 4+4 HT.=20 my current laptop has 256 SSD in replacement of system drive and I = removed the optical to put a 750G 7200 rpm drive in. considering either = 512gb SSD or 1tb spinning drive. SSD will gave much better battery life, = but the 750 is constantly full and I'm always juggling projects on it. = to bad large SSD's are still expensive. that said I edit and have = actually finished client projects on this machine PP edit, AE graphics, = Resolve grade, AME export and these are projects with 10 layers of video = in PP in including ultra keyer. S On Jul 4, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Chris Zwar wrote: > On 05/07/2014, at 6:35 AM, Peter Matulavich = wrote: >> As far as a retina screen, are you sure you need it? My MBP is razor = sharp without it -- one of the best screens I've seen and sharper than = my iMac's I would say, but that's probably because it's a much smaller = screen. >=20 > I didn't realise that you could get one without the retina display. I = hadn't really looked into it, hence the post. I just had a look online = and saw that Apple still sell the previous, non-retina 13" Macbook Pro = model too- with an SSD that would be quite appealing as it's upgradable. = Not sure how the graphics compares. >=20 > When I posted originally my iMac had just died and I didn't think I'd = get it working again, I was thinking I'd have to make a purchase the = next day. But I did get it up and running again, so the hope is that by = the time it dies for the 3rd time Apple will have released an updated = range (they're roughly due for an update) and I'll make the decision = then. >=20 > Actually the screen is the least of my concerns, I'm wondering if it's = worth spending more for the 15" and getting a quad-core. The 13" models = are all dual. Maybe that will change with the next release, who can = tell=85 >=20