From: "Jim Curtis" Received: from production003.einsteinsname02.net ([67.228.43.50] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5531725 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 03:11:32 +0200 Received: from 99-152-153-100.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net ([99.152.153.100]:62522 helo=[192.168.1.68]) by production003.einsteinsname02.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1X9l5f-000544-46 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:11:31 -0500 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_99420E87-E739-420F-B53E-A8E9BB89B849" Message-Id: <9B50AC48-2681-433B-8B2D-D91A4C050D11@me.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [AE] 23.976 to 59.94 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:11:30 -0500 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-EinsteinsEyes-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EinsteinsEyes-MailScanner-ID: 1X9l5f-000544-46 X-EinsteinsEyes-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-EinsteinsEyes-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-EinsteinsEyes-MailScanner-From: jpcurtis@me.com X-Spam-Status: No X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - production003.einsteinsname02.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - me.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: production003.einsteinsname02.net: authenticated_id: jim@hartprods.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail=_99420E87-E739-420F-B53E-A8E9BB89B849 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Just drop your 23.976 source interpreted as 23.976 into a 59.94 comp and = render it out at 59.94. You will be duping frames, but that's just the = way it is. Expect the old 3:2 cadence: 3 frames of source frame one, 2 = frames of frame 2 etc. On Jul 22, 2014, at 7:32 PM, Phil Spitler = wrote: > We are working on a spot that is live action based and has all been = done at 23.976 >=20 > Of course the client just told us they also need a version at 59.94. >=20 > I could add pulldown to to the 23.976 to make it 29.97 but how would I = get it to 59.94 ? >=20 > Duping interlaced frames doesn't sound like a good idea. >=20 > Any thoughts? >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Phil >=20 > Phil Spitler | Creative Technologist | Bonfire Labs | t : = 415.394.8200 m : 415.571.3139 >=20 > Website | Facebook | LinkedIn >=20 --Apple-Mail=_99420E87-E739-420F-B53E-A8E9BB89B849 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Just = drop your 23.976 source interpreted as 23.976 into a 59.94 comp and = render it out at 59.94.  You will be duping frames, but that's just = the way it is.  Expect the old 3:2 cadence:  3 frames of = source frame one, 2 frames of frame 2 = etc.




O= n Jul 22, 2014, at 7:32 PM, Phil Spitler <AE-List@media-motion.tv> = wrote:

We = are working on a spot that is live action based and has all been done at = 23.976

Of course the client just told us they also = need a version at 59.94.

I could add pulldown = to to the 23.976 to make it 29.97 but how would I get it to 59.94 = ?

Duping interlaced frames doesn't sound like a = good idea.

Any = thoughts?

Cheers

Phil

signature1 Phil = Spitler  |  Creative Technologist   |  Bonfire Labs  |  t : 415.394.8200  m : = 415.571.3139

Website | Facebook | LinkedIn


= --Apple-Mail=_99420E87-E739-420F-B53E-A8E9BB89B849--