From: "Mr. Eric D. Kirk" Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5536862 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:52:51 +0200 Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c1so3919323igq.15 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Jo+qOvH/UARJ92Z5SBwmllX4B7KRJBkm+xCCNfX1ZdQ=; b=0jfx1GnH+mvWVw4KT+iDIbcLyfFI7aAtUmhAJ7A1yD8fG7dmJkGUlzNOo1/wWo28vU 5YIcnafs3iWuCtM9GRH/Qyr2ld3wKWD5nAlhEis27pWy1stNGJvLqz7M3dW6/wrL1w3k BvntvASLomaxgiroveFtesXdV3k4wDLDT5mEQ3Pjf/GjyfQOuWPYBvx3Q140MQbKJUx5 PJ28a2PtZe92P8WBDgfAShDqbcDqKdytGcO/ETU1kNDsWKz+egKi2UKkIrwPPQ/ubG3N iR9f21lb92Gb7/D23uzd/228RKYeBLSK8JyM/4gJzS9tcK1CYFxSYaTUG0DdZ24Bul+Z A/QA== X-Received: by 10.50.33.16 with SMTP id n16mr33814492igi.15.1406566370793; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.56.50 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:52:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:52:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Looking for Recommendations on Creating Blur Matte To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0153840ce2605204ff43c0cf --089e0153840ce2605204ff43c0cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Victoria, Another gentleman asked last night but I just now uploaded a still to show what I'm up against and it's pretty much various angles of this, now zoomed in quite a bit. For example, right now, the picture on the right no longer even shows. http://i532.photobucket.com/albums/ee327/kirkeric/OfficeStillKIRK.jpg Eric On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Victoria Nece wrote: > Is the background already a little soft? I wonder if it might be possible > to batch through the frames using Photoshop's new feature that > automatically creates mattes based on out of focus pixels? > > Victoria > On Jul 27, 2014 9:43 PM, "scott.aelist" wrote: > >> can you post a still or a redacted still? >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk < >> AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> Ok, so I've got an odd one here. I am doing VFX for this movie and in >>> two scenes, the folks basically filmed at a location in which they did not >>> have pre-approval. Soooo, at first they wanted me to attempt to change the >>> entire background so that you could not tell it was the original place. >>> >>> I spent many days changing out ceiling lights, adding an exit sign, a >>> map on wall, etc but that did not seem to be enough. After exhausting >>> myself trying to explain that what they were asking was for someone to >>> completely rotoscope out several people, with lots of movement, etc and it >>> just was not doable. I tried to roto even one person out but with the >>> amount of movement, hair flying around, etc, it was not within my ability. >>> >>> I think even a roto expert would be shying away from this. So, that's >>> the background. >>> >>> Now, the approach has changed to them asking me to give it more of like >>> a camera depth thing where I just blur all of the background. That too has >>> it's challenges but masking and feathering out a blur adjustment layer is >>> definitely less noticeable than the roto deal. >>> >>> However, the amount of blur they want seems pretty excessive and as you >>> might imagine, the more blur, the more likely it will be noticeable as you >>> try to gradually feather out edges as the meet the person in the foreground. >>> >>> I was trying to do something like create a matte using the much lighter >>> background (the wall is white) and then just blur that layer. >>> >>> So, I'm looking for ideas on an approach that one of you smart folks >>> here might have. >>> >>> Thanks ahead. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> -- >>> *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* >>> *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* >>> *The Night Visitor | VFX* >>> *443.206.1347 <443.206.1347>* >>> >>> *www.kirkproductions.com >>> kirkproductions@gmail.com * >>> *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ >>> * >>> >>> >> >> -- *Eric D. Kirk | **Kirk Productions* *Hidden in the Woods | VFX* *The Night Visitor | VFX* *443.206.1347* *www.kirkproductions.com kirkproductions@gmail.com * *IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ * --089e0153840ce2605204ff43c0cf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Victoria,
=C2=A0
Another gentl= eman asked last night but I just now uploaded a still to show what I'm = up against and it's pretty much various angles of this, now zoomed in q= uite a bit.=C2=A0 For example, right now, the picture on the right no longe= r even shows.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
Eric


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Victor= ia Nece <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Is the background already a little soft? I wonder if it might be possibl= e to batch through the frames using Photoshop's new feature that automa= tically creates mattes based on out of focus pixels?

Victoria

On Jul 27, 2014 9:43 PM, "scott.aelist"= ; <AE-List@= media-motion.tv> wrote:
can you post a still or a redacted still?


On Sun, Jul 27, 2014= at 5:40 PM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
Hello All,

Ok, so I= 9;ve got an odd one here. =C2=A0I am doing VFX for this movie and in two sc= enes, the folks basically filmed at a location in which they did not have p= re-approval. =C2=A0Soooo, at first they wanted me to attempt to change the = entire background so that you could not tell it was the original place.

I spent many days changing out ceiling lights, adding a= n exit sign, a map on wall, etc but that did not seem to be enough. =C2=A0A= fter exhausting myself trying to explain that what they were asking was for= someone to completely rotoscope out several people, with lots of movement,= etc and it just was not doable. =C2=A0I tried to roto even one person out = but with the amount of movement, hair flying around, etc, it was not within= my ability.

I think even a roto expert would be shying away from th= is. =C2=A0So, that's the background.

Now, the = approach has changed to them asking me to give it more of like a camera dep= th thing where I just blur all of the background. =C2=A0That too has it'= ;s challenges but masking and feathering out a blur adjustment layer is def= initely less noticeable than the roto deal.

However, the amount of blur they want seems pretty exce= ssive and as you might imagine, the more blur, the more likely it will be n= oticeable as you try to gradually feather out edges as the meet the person = in the foreground.

I was trying to do something like create a matte using = the much lighter background (the wall is white) and then just blur that lay= er.

So, I'm looking for ideas on an approach t= hat one of you smart folks here might have.

Thanks ahead.
<= br>
Eric

--
Eric D. Kirk |=C2= =A0Kirk Productions
Hidden in the Woods | VFX
The Night Visitor | VFX
<= div>www.kir= kproductions.com
kirkproducti= ons@gmail.com
=C2=A0




--
<= b>Eric D. Kirk |=C2=A0Kirk Productions
Hidden in th= e Woods | VFX
The Night Visitor | VFX
=
443.206.1347
=C2=A0
--089e0153840ce2605204ff43c0cf--