From: "Tony Romain" Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 5541799 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:21:53 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.110] (rrcs-24-43-70-42.west.biz.rr.com [24.43.70.42]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mreueus003) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LsRIM-1WHWkw1ThI-0123uq; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:21:52 +0200 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509 Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 13:21:45 -0700 Subject: Re: [AE] Use of 4K Cameras To: AE list Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [AE] Use of 4K Cameras References: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3490089712_1137847" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:N9DXNkByKugYJhjNrFwfb0bj2BvwXvuD8bo9Vxm12A5 92MV19WOR3E+E4aNg64ZdfCfOK2a33s0fneXGjv9Tj6f+nmW4G LnSxGFuO3qKH+ohrSA2/lJQ+m758D5/jsJuK8Ft3+RpaF+uzf0 UCUHQ76DGiQT3Q3PcYrApqHsj77tQpoi2xUSp/RaZGpHev+9hW T8OJ8UbMleMDq5VvIP1PT8vChtaXPEv92S4PymDJ44pVcDICQ6 4rkLKIgVq9XQQfUzE2ZwBO9J/ASmCWpXKfcMre25UZEplBm9kx WxmulLI+MIDeS/vzXaQNlLXZaOs+y/fIYb6eL1/GdvVxetOiEu 5v4zXMpDaIM3sfMPOckiWji3iG1st668Px3RzYh2R9QV2BIh7g enohBG7ZVM3jw== > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3490089712_1137847 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Curious if anyone thinks 4k will become a the new delivery format? How likely is this? =20 I can appreciate it as a tool for acquiring content as Brian mentions, but not sure of the value as a final delivery format. Notice how 3d television= s have gradually evaporated. Electronics makers are so desperate to claw som= e more cash away from consumers, I feel like these formats get seeded to us i= n a some what insidious way. Is there a pressing need for 4K broadcasts? I sometimes feel like HD on a relatively large monitor is almost too much fidelity for most average size rooms=8A --=20 tony romain | principal/creative director trance motion graphic animation and design 323 651 1114 www.trancedesigns.com From: AE list Reply-To: AE list Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 1:13 PM To: AE list Subject: Re: [AE] Use of 4K Cameras It depends entirely on the kind of things you want to shoot. 4K currently has little real to-market delivery path, but it is a useful acquisition format for post work, since there are so many pixels to work with, crop in on etc. "Shoot now-Frame later" is a viable strategy with 4K. And it is relatively future-proof, I suppose, if we all believe 4K is an inevitable delivery format. As for your second question, a DSLR is a fine way to aquire video if you ar= e accustomed to operating a film camera. If, however, you need things like fast auto-focus while recording, wide field of focus and smooth, motorized zoom, these things are harder to come by in the DSLR world. Also, unmodifie= d DSLRs in the US are not allowed to record a clip longer than 30 minutes (fo= r tax reasons!), so if you need to shoot long events, a "real" video camera i= s your best bet... or plan to budget for an external drive like the Blackmagi= c HyperDeck Shuttle. I do shoot video with my 5D Mk III, but all of the add-ons make it much mor= e cumbersome than a dedicated video camera, especially for walking around. No issues that I'm aware of with any of this and AE. Brian --B_3490089712_1137847 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Curious if anyone = thinks 4k will become a the new delivery format?  How likely is this? &= nbsp;

I can appreciate it as a tool for acquiring c= ontent as Brian mentions, but not sure of the value as a final delivery form= at.  Notice how 3d televisions have gradually evaporated.  Electro= nics makers are so desperate to claw some more cash away from consumers, I f= eel like these formats get seeded to us in a some what insidious way.  = Is there a pressing need for 4K broadcasts?  I sometimes feel like HD o= n a relatively large monitor is almost too much fidelity for most average si= ze rooms…



--
tony romain | principa= l/creative director

trance
motion graphic animation and design
323 651 1114
www.trancedesigns.com

From: AE list <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
R= eply-To: AE list <AE-Lis= t@media-motion.tv>
Date: Tu= esday, August 5, 2014 1:13 PM
To: = AE list <AE-List@media-motion.tv= >
Subject: Re: [AE] Use of = 4K Cameras

It depends entirely on the kind of things you want to shoot.

4= K currently has little real to-market delivery path, but it is a useful acqu= isition format for post work, since there are so many pixels to work with, c= rop in on etc. "Shoot now-Frame later" is a viable strategy with 4K.  A= nd it is relatively future-proof, I suppose, if we all believe 4K is an inev= itable delivery format.

As for your second question, a DSLR is a fine= way to aquire video if you are accustomed to operating a film camera. If, h= owever, you need things like fast auto-focus while recording, wide field of = focus and smooth, motorized zoom, these things are harder to come by in the = DSLR world. Also, unmodified DSLRs in the US are not allowed to record a cli= p longer than 30 minutes (for tax reasons!), so if you need to shoot long ev= ents, a "real" video camera is your best bet... or plan to budget for an ext= ernal drive like the Blackmagic HyperDeck Shuttle.

I do shoot video with my 5D Mk III, but= all of the add-ons make it much more cumbersome than a dedicated video came= ra, especially for walking around.

No issues that I'm aware of with any of this and AE.

Brian
=
--B_3490089712_1137847--