From: "ML meassi" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Received: from mr004msr.fastwebnet.it ([85.18.95.67] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP id 5544797 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:52:12 +0200
Received: from MacInfetto.local (100.66.126.185) by mr004msr.fastwebnet.it (8.5.140.03) (authenticated as gianluca.meassi@fastwebnet.it)
        id 533E5C0F0699C42C for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:52:13 +0200
Message-ID: <53E48FBE.8090708@signumdigit.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:52:14 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Subject: Re: [AE] Use of 4K Cameras
References: <list-5541919@media-motion.tv>
In-Reply-To: <list-5541919@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030701090109010102010809"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030701090109010102010809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Yes, you're right if it's a pro that look at the 
video.
Most customers percive things in a different 
manner.
Even a 300 fps slow motion Full HD video have 
more impact than 4k video in my experience.

We shoot 4k half of the times but this, most of 
the times, is a choice we make for technical 
aspects (reframing, CK, track, etc).
As here the end use is always on 2k or less 
resolution most of the customers / agencies 
don't ask for 4k.

GL

Il 06/08/14 02:37, Steve Oakley ha scritto:
> and the problem with theory vs reality is 
> reality. having seen 4K many times ( shoot, 
> edit, project all 4K ) there is a difference 
> that you can perceive even under less than 
> ideal viewing conditions. until you get to see 
> good 4K I’d suggest holding off a bit on 
> judgement as to if its worth it or not. 10bit 
> color space is also a big deal which is part 
> of the up coming standard for 4K.


--------------030701090109010102010809
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Yes, you're right if it's a pro that look at the video.<br>
    Most customers percive things in a different manner. <br>
    Even a 300 fps slow motion Full HD video have more impact than 4k
    video in my experience.<br>
    <br>
    We shoot 4k half of the times but this, most of the times, is a
    choice we make for technical aspects (reframing, CK, track, etc).<br>
    As here the end use is always on 2k or less resolution most of the
    customers / agencies don't ask for 4k.<br>
    <br>
    GL<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 06/08/14 02:37, Steve Oakley ha
      scritto:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:list-5541919@media-motion.tv" type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      and the problem with theory vs reality is reality. having seen 4K
      many times ( shoot, edit, project all 4K ) there is a difference
      that you can perceive even under less than ideal viewing
      conditions. until you get to see good 4K I’d suggest holding off a
      bit on judgement as to if its worth it or not. 10bit color space
      is also a big deal which is part of the up coming standard for 4K.<br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------030701090109010102010809--