From: "rendernyc" Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 5544991 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 15:59:19 +0200 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wn1so4056157obc.24 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 06:59:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9+7KTf0TBOpW3g77yUGiRiQdFNGaTV7zruTZGkP7CS8=; b=IgqXaPBQ9XpxA72kWGcewfQYwKiMvnO1BMrPMrWW2HTWAhLcLW4VnGvz/82idJWZfL eRN8xuZyHGt36wc/n45R+rr6PVtVIfggH7JxIG7aiYJAlDontZdue4bR55wL1AP8avd+ Ek30+/FjFPLPthqY4uP/yAL9KPyqdTKXdjE2JmmOBr6xZPFHWlPHEwiBRZgcVfAn5dYg H/av1iUGp27V0jQk8apjxi13fhLGa2iovkS36Iy+Nn59Kk+Myv/J/+PFhyvXfFsbRR0B mwVGwWp9BMo3O97YtnM/FRnCAws441QSZ4t+DQfQIpG2mJe/e8wgWj7hWm7okUU7zeDx CnwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.102.97 with SMTP id fn1mr30830134obb.29.1407506358770; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 06:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.71.77 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 06:59:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 09:59:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Use of 4K Cameras To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0153828488a06c05001e9c89 --089e0153828488a06c05001e9c89 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i was in a best buy a couple months back and there was a samsung UHD panel on the end cap of an aisle and the difference in the panel itself was stunning compared to the other sets on display. it was 50, maybe 55", nothing enormous but everything about that panel stood out over the other sets. the angle of view, colors, detail were all amazing and you dont have to be a pro to see that difference. so while at that size resolution might not really matter mathematically, the panel itself was a major improvement over the HD versions On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:52 AM, ML meassi wrote: > Yes, you're right if it's a pro that look at the video. > Most customers percive things in a different manner. > Even a 300 fps slow motion Full HD video have more impact than 4k video i= n > my experience. > > We shoot 4k half of the times but this, most of the times, is a choice we > make for technical aspects (reframing, CK, track, etc). > As here the end use is always on 2k or less resolution most of the > customers / agencies don't ask for 4k. > > GL > > Il 06/08/14 02:37, Steve Oakley ha scritto: > > and the problem with theory vs reality is reality. having seen 4K many > times ( shoot, edit, project all 4K ) there is a difference that you can > perceive even under less than ideal viewing conditions. until you get to > see good 4K I=E2=80=99d suggest holding off a bit on judgement as to if i= ts worth > it or not. 10bit color space is also a big deal which is part of the up > coming standard for 4K. > > > --=20 danny princz vimeo.com/rendernyc --089e0153828488a06c05001e9c89 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i was in a best buy a couple months back and there was a s= amsung UHD panel on the end cap of an aisle and the difference in the panel= itself was stunning compared to the other sets on display.=C2=A0

<= /div>
it was 50, maybe 55", nothing enormous but everything about that = panel stood out over the other sets.

the angle of = view, colors, detail were all amazing and you dont have to be a pro to see = that difference.

so while at that size resolution might not really matte= r mathematically, the panel itself was a major improvement over the HD vers= ions


On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:52 AM, ML meassi <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Yes, you're right if it's a pro that look at the video.
Most customers percive things in a different manner.
Even a 300 fps slow motion Full HD video have more impact than 4k video in my experience.

We shoot 4k half of the times but this, most of the times, is a choice we make for technical aspects (reframing, CK, track, etc).
As here the end use is always on 2k or less resolution most of the customers / agencies don't ask for 4k.

GL

Il 06/08/14 02:37, Steve Oakley ha scritto:
=20 and the problem with theory vs reality is reality. having seen 4K many times ( shoot, edit, project all 4K ) there is a difference that you can perceive even under less than ideal viewing conditions. until you get to see good 4K I=E2=80=99d suggest holding = off a bit on judgement as to if its worth it or not. 10bit color space is also a big deal which is part of the up coming standard for 4K.




--
--089e0153828488a06c05001e9c89--