From: "Robert W. Walker" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.8.17
Message-Id: <20171128160949.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.9870c70b18.wbe@email04.godaddy.com>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Subject: RE: [AE] New AE script- Rendergarden
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:09:49 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0

Yes; see my second test also posted here that produced a 7:53 RG render=0Ao=
f a comp that took 11:29 "normally". RG is a nice functionality update=0Ato=
 what bgrender used to do. And it costs only a couple months' worth of=0Awh=
at I pay month after month after month to Adobe, who should be coming=0Aup =
with this stuff but apparently haven't hired the best and brightest=0Ato gi=
ve us what we ask (and pay) for.  Anyway, congratulations,=0ASWORDFISH peop=
le!  And THANK YOU.  I'm happy to give you my business.=0A=0ARobert W. Walk=
er=0AWalkerSound=0AWalker/Fitzgibbon TV & Film=0ALos Angeles CA USA=0A=0A=
=0A> -------- Original Message --------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] New AE script=
- Rendergarden=0A> From: "Brendan Bolles" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>=0A> Dat=
e: Tue, November 28, 2017 5:37 pm=0A> To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-Lis=
t@media-motion.tv>=0A> =0A> =0A> On Nov 28, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Robert W. Wal=
ker wrote:=0A> =0A> > I have to test it some more but my first shot=0A> > a=
t it took a comp that AE's native render took 38:49 to do...and=0A> > Rende=
rGarden spit it out in a little over SEVEN minutes.=0A> =0A> =0A> Thanks fo=
r sharing, Robert!  Obviously the benefits from running multiple processes =
(i.e. Gardeners) will depend heavily on the comp being rendered, but we fin=
d that you can get at least a 2x speedup on most real-world comps.=0A> =0A>=
 =0A> Brendan=0A> =0A> =0A> +---End of message---+=0A> To unsubscribe send =
any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>