| ||||||||||
| Yes; see my second test also posted here that produced a 7:53 RG render of a comp that took 11:29 "normally". RG is a nice functionality update to what bgrender used to do. And it costs only a couple months' worth of what I pay month after month after month to Adobe, who should be coming up with this stuff but apparently haven't hired the best and brightest to give us what we ask (and pay) for. Anyway, congratulations, SWORDFISH people! And THANK YOU. I'm happy to give you my business. Robert W. Walker WalkerSound Walker/Fitzgibbon TV & Film Los Angeles CA USA > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [AE] New AE script- Rendergarden > From: "Brendan Bolles" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> > Date: Tue, November 28, 2017 5:37 pm > To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> > > > On Nov 28, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Robert W. Walker wrote: > > > I have to test it some more but my first shot > > at it took a comp that AE's native render took 38:49 to do...and > > RenderGarden spit it out in a little over SEVEN minutes. > > > Thanks for sharing, Robert! Obviously the benefits from running multiple processes (i.e. Gardeners) will depend heavily on the comp being rendered, but we find that you can get at least a 2x speedup on most real-world comps. > > > Brendan > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
