Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv — Message #63489
From: Brian Maffitt <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Subject: Re: [AE] New AE script- Rendergarden
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:16:36 -0500
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Congratulations Brendan and Matt, I was impressed with the beta and we're going to purchase a dozen or more licenses for my current gig.

We're planning to use a regular farm for heavy lifting along with the garden for shorter renders... I'd love to know whether the Garden could be employed to maximize the use of processors in a farm setup? Any integration tips would be appreciated.

Congrats again,
Brian

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Brendan Bolles <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2017, at 5:09 PM, robertw wrote:

> As to whether it re-renders to stitch the segments together, I think not. At least in my limited testing, i could find no visible difference between the RG output and a direct AE output using ProResHQ and 4444. I mean NO difference, even blown up 200%.


Correct, the combining of movie segments does not involve re-encoding, while the Post Render Actions do (since they usually are converting your render to a different codec).

If you see shifts in the Post Render Action movies, are you doing the comparison in After Effects?  ProRes movies often look different in QuickTime player.  And ProRes is a lossy YUV codec, so you expect at least a small change from the original RGB.

If there's something beyond that, send us some steps to reproduce and maybe we can get to the bottom of it.  Maybe the FFmpeg command line could be altered.


Brendan


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster