From: "Robert W. Walker" Received: from p3plwbeout04-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.227] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 6363452 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 03:44:30 +0100 Received: from p3plgemwbe04-06.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.144]) by :WBEOUT: with SMTP id JsPVe5hgQArbqJsPVePtH8; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:47:41 -0700 X-SID: JsPVe5hgQArbq Received: (qmail 151555 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2017 02:47:41 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 104.33.199.102 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 6.8.17 Message-Id: <20171128194739.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.6e486951ec.wbe@email04.godaddy.com> To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] New AE script- Rendergarden Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 19:47:39 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKgu6witZIg4reHObo4BA4ARkFSEGATU7KZD2gjb8xV1mrws2Qz254eyjvEWtA9YLg1XcfaylhPwvgT+hzwLwpQU+7vnQIH3Ip9ISVcgUJjEF8VSSJR7 HFF6bjMXJ92f1PVTIxY2txGnXXfLcyDZNG8oiqfMj7R2qDRxtovUmY6wUei9RljqH0jdY4z+ppT9W2bAdll8EfTBu2jgcvi2Ms2SQk5G7RKPrRsVKBBgemXv Brendan, I compared the post-render against the "master" render in=0APremie= re Pro, lining them up on a timeline and then toggling the upper=0Atrack on= and off. I can send you the files if you want to PM me with an=0Aemail I c= an send a hightail link to. Easily reproducible though, I'm=0Asure. The shi= ft seems more than what you would expect from a single=0Are-encode pass, ha= ving tested multiple generations of ProRes re-encodes=0Afor a long time.=0A= =0ARobert W. Walker=0AWalkerSound=0AWalker/Fitzgibbon TV & Film=0ALos Angel= es CA USA=0A=0A=0A=0A> -------- Original Message --------=0A> Subject: Re: = [AE] New AE script- Rendergarden=0A> From: "Brendan Bolles" =0A> Date: Tue, November 28, 2017 8:32 pm=0A> To: "After Effects = Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> On Nov 28, 2017, at 5:09= PM, robertw wrote:=0A> =0A> > As to whether it re-renders to stitch the se= gments together, I think not. At least in my limited testing, i could find = no visible difference between the RG output and a direct AE output using Pr= oResHQ and 4444. I mean NO difference, even blown up 200%.=0A> =0A> =0A> Co= rrect, the combining of movie segments does not involve re-encoding, while = the Post Render Actions do (since they usually are converting your render t= o a different codec).=0A> =0A> If you see shifts in the Post Render Action = movies, are you doing the comparison in After Effects? ProRes movies often= look different in QuickTime player. And ProRes is a lossy YUV codec, so y= ou expect at least a small change from the original RGB.=0A> =0A> If there'= s something beyond that, send us some steps to reproduce and maybe we can g= et to the bottom of it. Maybe the FFmpeg command line could be altered.=0A= > =0A> =0A> Brendan=0A> =0A> =0A> +---End of message---+=0A> To unsubscribe= send any message to