| ||||||||||
| Thanks all for the responses. ***bicubic seems to be best for taking 4K drone stuff to 1080.*** I have worked with AE since 3.1 and I remember a time when those switches were best, draft and (i think) wireframe. That was stuck in my head and I did not even know it changed! (but Chris Z, if I'm not mistaken, the default is bi-linear (straight) and the curved icon is bi-cubic. :-) I'm not even sure how to choose to work in a linear space! But I'll use the google - feel free to add anything. Thanks again! Mike O > From: "Chris Zwar" <AE-List@media-motion.tv> > Subject: Re: [AE] 4K to 1080 > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 14:52:32 +1100 > Message-Id: <A36ADDC6-1D7C-4317-8168-D9AF688959CB@chriszwar.com> > > > Can only offer a reminder that clicking on the diagonal line in the = > timeline box cycles between 3 scaling algorithms - nearest neighbour, = > bicubic and bilinear. Bicubic is the default, click on the line and it = > turns into a curve - that=E2=80=99s bilinear. Click again and it faces > = > the other way and looks more chunky - that=E2=80=99s nearest neighbour. > =20= > > > Funnily enough I just finished work on a project that involved some = > CAD-generated DWG files that were converted to high-res .ai, and they = > looked the best using plain old nearest neighbour. Never used that = > option in production before. > > If you wanted to get really technical, then scaling is more realistic if > = > you use a linear working space, but unless you REALLY want to or already = > love working in linear, I wouldn=E2=80=99t recommend changing to it just > = > for that reason alone. But if you have time to do tests and > you=E2=80=99r= e not happy with the results you=E2=80=99re getting then it > can=E2=80=99t = hurt to make the project linear (and 16bit minimum) just > to see what = happens. > > > -Chris |
