From: "Brendan Bolles" Received: from nail.lmi.net ([66.117.140.18] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 6405884 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 23:44:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.16] (unknown [12.42.42.62]) by nail.lmi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41AEAE425F for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:48:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [AE] Aftercodecs vs Media Encoder In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:48:37 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) On Feb 14, 2018, at 5:59 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: > After an email exchange with Brendan when it was released, it was = pretty clear it could not help my large film projects or render farm. Did you ever try it? There's a free trial. If you have CPU, RAM, and disk resources to spare when rendering in CC = 2018, RenderGarden could help. If you are maxxed out on any one of = those, it likely won't. Brendan