| ||||||||||
| > If you have CPU, RAM, and disk resources to spare when rendering in CC 2018, RenderGarden could help. If you are maxxed out on any one of those, it likely won't. I did not as I'm always nearly maxed on 1 or more of these when rendering stuff for the film and often all three. Typical render involves pushing 2TB sources files per 1 minute of rendered footage out. AE 2014 is pegging all cores at 100%, 600 MB/s of disk reads and RAM 85 to 90% full with 10 threads, 10GB or so per thread... -----Original Message----- From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 5:49 PM To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv> Subject: Re: [AE] Aftercodecs vs Media Encoder On Feb 14, 2018, at 5:59 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: > After an email exchange with Brendan when it was released, it was pretty clear it could not help my large film projects or render farm. Did you ever try it? There's a free trial. If you have CPU, RAM, and disk resources to spare when rendering in CC 2018, RenderGarden could help. If you are maxxed out on any one of those, it likely won't. Brendan +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv> |
