From: "Gordon Mah" Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 6522566 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:23:54 +0200 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q1-v6so7101679pff.13 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:31:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=uWdHLq171Y/X4KWGjxjU+7dwzmCH+sSzoh+A+4B9Y0s=; b=bIofWkNpGkl+zA3BEQXlK60T9w7gv/C6CqdC402KVgULEg5XbJ9BKLIFCmNthZ1owt 5RbaN+R0d/Uck8lGT60Ju9xqBADiz8SmfRUFndgIyTJfO8taHTur8WvgNG7cuhyN8liA Qgm7EFj097TTa7SqOe4hFxwTLs4NolSyX9HdmYC1A3IQTefqRZcracPXN9Xzwdyr8+3J 4uy5L8GresLpBQUNqyW8qQI6iabAsB0W72Vecll3qtOseIexAWCDIqWPd7rcAbg7xfEE ajdKyVvdSoVtHL6j84Onvcfd5ur47VMbUf7AQvQ8wrS6kPBDpmA74+qtweaNYdWLTHBc JX5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=uWdHLq171Y/X4KWGjxjU+7dwzmCH+sSzoh+A+4B9Y0s=; b=DJqGXl8l0A/7wHidzhBtum349n1eL2YZH8J5cDTenHaoyJOC9zqK36EQbrV00BGPzw eylQR3xH9uHwMPAlL9WObLrJl4lor5VgeKpyIbZW16QeL7wjRIIyXGY3xpuvieYV8/q+ Q8E7CPIqBZNXjvYk6Jx1jTIae+nLfiXX3pHoLAvyvemCtYDRkJoX8X0EScuC2RqLS+u9 mSU2lg2GOzBDpSB7Sk8UNsQg3iXyDTOQqQHEXMaj7qtLK61z+/HOjZkZYjC3JGxaUFvr EJVeJZxokr/KVDrkkTRiEXumOrlf0yCj1k7HLwprkzNEcd+s3Es3jrBY+SvfrtlayOgS MsLA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1EVLsA0Cpkkq4HJm+8jRFoWp5D1AvQqxBhSBy6RegiYWHqRgax 2OD+ZKA1l7QErd93GpH64qw/JrBG X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJl1LdYO/BXN66TYcT1Y1uIHz3YcPF0SbtM+xYKaWYg/owst5daoYCRVmnoIKJZzbedQUB5pQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:cfc2:: with SMTP id b185-v6mr7466822pfg.37.1529965907305; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:31:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [128.149.86.153] ([128.149.86.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 86-v6sm100783pfp.17.2018.06.25.15.31.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:31:44 -0700 Subject: Re: [AE] VR Tools GPU/CPU VRAM limitations Message-Id: <0A95735F-DDFC-44E7-8AEA-69A9BB970448@gmail.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: After Effects Mail List X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15F79) Maybe a typo, but you both mean =E2=80=9Cfail over mode=E2=80=9D not =E2=80=9C= fall over mode=E2=80=9D. The latter is what happens to old folks! ;) Sent from my iPad > On Jun 25, 2018, at 11:46 AM, Ross Shain wrote: >=20 > FYI... the Boris Continuum VR filters use GPU but also have a CPU fall ove= r mode. So currently less likely to produce GPU related errors when stacking= effects or working on a system with limited GPU. >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 >> On Jun 24, 2018, at 7:16 AM, Jarle Leirpoll wro= te: >>=20 >> Stephen van Vuuren wrote: >>> Interesting. But I doubt it's true since the VR Tools cannot work at all= >> wi=3D th GPU acceleration >turned off unlike Premiere's implementation. I= >> suspect =3D they are using the engine differently. >>>=20 >>> And if it were frame buffer by layer, in AE it's easy to have 5 or 10 >> layer=3D s in a very simple >project vs. Premiere. 50 or more layers is s= till >> common =3D in AE. You would a graphic card of >50GB+ of VRAM (which don't= >> exist). That =3D would be a fatal, dead on arrival design flaw. >>=20 >> I'm not sure why this would be a design flaw. This is the VRAM needed to d= o >> things in real time. Less VRAM means frames need to be shuttled in and ou= t >> of VRAM, which takes longer, and you will not get real-time playback, tha= t's >> all. You don't need 50GB+ to handle 50 layers. You'll just have to render= >> before you can get smooth playback. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to